2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.01.075
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and electrocatalytic performance of carbon-supported platinum nanoparticles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
35
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
35
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CO stripping curves for testing the CO oxidation activity and tolerance were performed in 0.5 M H2SO4, where CO gas was bubbled through the solution for 15 min, setting the electrode potential at 0.1 V. After removing the dissolved CO by N2 bubbling through the solution for 30 min, CO was oxidized by sweeping the potential from 0.0 to 1.0 V at 20 mV s −1 without stirring. The electrochemically active area (ECSA) was estimated, taking into account that the oxidation of a CO monolayer on polycrystalline Pt needs 420 µC cm −2 [16,57]. After CO stripping, the activity of the Pt(Cu)/C and the Pt-Ru(Cu)/C catalysts was recovered, as shown by consecutive cyclic voltammograms, which retraced those obtained before the CO adsorption.…”
Section: Working Electrodes and Electrochemical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The CO stripping curves for testing the CO oxidation activity and tolerance were performed in 0.5 M H2SO4, where CO gas was bubbled through the solution for 15 min, setting the electrode potential at 0.1 V. After removing the dissolved CO by N2 bubbling through the solution for 30 min, CO was oxidized by sweeping the potential from 0.0 to 1.0 V at 20 mV s −1 without stirring. The electrochemically active area (ECSA) was estimated, taking into account that the oxidation of a CO monolayer on polycrystalline Pt needs 420 µC cm −2 [16,57]. After CO stripping, the activity of the Pt(Cu)/C and the Pt-Ru(Cu)/C catalysts was recovered, as shown by consecutive cyclic voltammograms, which retraced those obtained before the CO adsorption.…”
Section: Working Electrodes and Electrochemical Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of Pt used could also be decreased in this form, because it is expensive and has a limited abundance in the Earth [3,7,8,11,[16][17][18]. In this way, Pt-Ru and Pt alloy nanoparticles containing Au, Ni, Cu, Co, Pd, and/or other transition metals have been tested on different carbon substrates as anodic catalysts [1,2,6,[9][10][11]13,16,17,[19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reported average diameters of Pt and PtRu particles were 2.5 nm [31] and 2.7 nm [32], respectively. The metal loading on the electrode was 20 g cm −2 for both Pt/C and PtRu/C.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Experimentally reported values are very variable as it depends on many factors, and our value fits within the range of the reported values. [84][85][86][87] It must be kept in mind that the experimental value and our own value are very dependent on how the system is made. These differences can cause very large changes in the amount of surface area that a moiety occupies.…”
Section: Platinum Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%