2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.07.063
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and electrochemical performance of FeF3/V2O5 composite cathode material for lithium-ion battery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, it is well known that pristine bulk V 2 O 5 is not an appropriate cathode material because of its low lithium diffusion coefficient and poor structural stability with lithium insertion/extraction, which lead to bad battery performance such as poor capacity retention and low rate capability. Recently, many studies have been focused on the composite or novel structured V 2 O 5 cathode materials [5][6][7][8]. Especially, the nanostructured materials exhibit better electrochemical performance with respect to bulk V 2 O 5 by virtue of their morphology properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it is well known that pristine bulk V 2 O 5 is not an appropriate cathode material because of its low lithium diffusion coefficient and poor structural stability with lithium insertion/extraction, which lead to bad battery performance such as poor capacity retention and low rate capability. Recently, many studies have been focused on the composite or novel structured V 2 O 5 cathode materials [5][6][7][8]. Especially, the nanostructured materials exhibit better electrochemical performance with respect to bulk V 2 O 5 by virtue of their morphology properties.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6(c). Bare FeF 3 shows a reversible capacity of 49.8 mAhg À1 at the 50 th cycle with a poor capacity fading rate of 1.14% per cycle [16,18,20,36]. This inferior cycling stability is attributed to the large particle size and low electrical conductivity [16,18,36].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, its practical application has been hampered by the low electrical conductivity and slow diffusion rate of lithium ions, caused by the highly ionic FeeF chemical bond. Numerous attempts have been made to solve these problems by fabricating nanostructures with porosity and wire-like shapes [13,14], down-sized nanoparticles [15], Co-doped nanocrystals [16], and nanocomposites with Fe 2 O 3 [17], V 2 O 5 [18], and conductive carbon matrices [19e24]. In particular, FeF 3 /graphene composites showed highly improved electrochemical performances compared to bare FeF 3 because the flexible graphene sheets effectively increase the electrical conductivity of FeF 3 by forming large intimate contacts in the composites [24e27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the high iconicity of iron fluoride shows an electronically insulating character 12 . To improve conductivity, composite materials with conductive materials such as MoS2 13 , V2O5 14 , single-wall carbon nanotube 11 , graphitic oxide 15 , activated carbon 16 and carbon black 12 made by several methods, such as liquid-phase method and mechanical ball-milling method, were reported. Among composite methods, reported mechanical ball-milling method can also perform nanosizing of particles at the same time 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%