2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2009.02.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and function of a new class of human prolactin antagonists

Abstract: SummaryΔ41-52 hPRL (human prolactin with residues 41-52 removed) is a lead compound for a new class of hPRL antagonists. The deleted sequence contains residues that functionally couple sites 1 and 2, the two hormone surfaces that each bind receptors. Δ41-52 hPRL retains 0.03% agonist activity in FDC-1 cell bioassays, a 3,054-fold reduction in activity, and displays approximately 100-fold less agonist activity than G129R hPRL, an antagonist that reduces the binding of hPRL receptor at site 2 during the formatio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The intrinsic dynamics of the hormone, favored by the presence of the two long loops, seems to be a prerequisite for its fully functional interaction with the receptor, as hypothesized by Jomain et al (20) and by the antagonistic properties of the ⌬41-52-hPRL (47). As evidenced by the superimposition of the three different hormones in complex with PRLR receptor, the binding of receptor 1 seems to impose the final structure of the hormone, at least at the level of binding site 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The intrinsic dynamics of the hormone, favored by the presence of the two long loops, seems to be a prerequisite for its fully functional interaction with the receptor, as hypothesized by Jomain et al (20) and by the antagonistic properties of the ⌬41-52-hPRL (47). As evidenced by the superimposition of the three different hormones in complex with PRLR receptor, the binding of receptor 1 seems to impose the final structure of the hormone, at least at the level of binding site 1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…This led several teams to investigate new strategies aimed at targeting PRL actions rather than PRL expression, which resulted in the development of PRL analogs acting as competitive antagonists of the PRL receptor (PRLR). [12][13][14] Unfortunately, although these antagonists are promising therapeutic candidates, their affinity for PRLR is weaker than that of wild-type (wt) PRL. To improve the affinity and efficiency of these molecules, we need to understand the precise mechanism of PRLR activation, a question on which our team has focused for several years using a crystallographic approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis of this information is critical for the rational design of antagonists or for understanding the mechanism by which hPRL agonists and antagonists regulate receptor activity. Site-directed mutagenesis frequently has been used to identify binding interfaces as well as interactions within prolactin that either maintain structure or functionally couple sites 1 and 2 (4,(17)(18)(19)(20)(21)(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27)(28)(29)(30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). These studies have used a variety of functional end points to assess the effects of mutations, including binding of 125 I-labeled hormone to cells or membranes containing prolactin receptors or cellular biological assays that typically use growth as their end point.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%