2013
DOI: 10.1002/prot.24266
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and function of a TetR family transcriptional regulator, SbtR, from thermus thermophilus HB8

Abstract: SbtR is one of the four TetR family transcriptional regulators present in the extremely thermophilic bacterium, Thermus thermophilus HB8. We identified 10 genes controlled by four promoters with negative regulation by SbtR in vitro. The SbtR-regulated gene products include probable transporters, probable enzymes for sugar or amino acid metabolism, and nucleic acid-related enzymes. SbtR binds pseudopalindromic sequences, with the consensus sequence of 5'-TGACCCNNKGGTCA-3' surrounding the promoters, and has a pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
8
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
2
8
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the LH spiral disulfide bonds are known to confer structural stability (55–57). Similar scenario was also observed in another TetR-FTR protein, SbtR ( Thermus thermophilus HB8) where the disulfide bond possess a LH spiral geometry and partakes in stabilizing the dimeric unit (57). To shed light on the role played by the disulfide bond in CprB, cysteine 159 was mutated to serine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…In general, the LH spiral disulfide bonds are known to confer structural stability (55–57). Similar scenario was also observed in another TetR-FTR protein, SbtR ( Thermus thermophilus HB8) where the disulfide bond possess a LH spiral geometry and partakes in stabilizing the dimeric unit (57). To shed light on the role played by the disulfide bond in CprB, cysteine 159 was mutated to serine.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 63%
“…These data strongly suggest that the TTHA1315 and TTHA1316 genes may be regulated by both the TTHA0167 and TTHB023 transcriptional repressors, requiring multiple effectors to be present to permit their maximal expression in vivo. This co-ordinate regulation may also help explain why previous investigators did not report TTHA1315 and TTHA1316 being regulated by TTHA0167 in vivo, even though they well recognized TTHA0167 binding to these gene promoters in genomic selection experiments [22]. We were able to confirm this using publicly available microarray data and GEO2R, finding that TTHA1315 and TTHA1316 are not among the top 250 genes whose expression is affected by TTHA0167 deletion (Table S3).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…In the case of TTHA1315/16, we believe multiple transcriptional repressors may be involved in their regulation. In fact, we had previously shown that these genes are likely targets of another T. thermophilus HB8 TetR-family transcriptional repressor, TTHA0167, otherwise known as SbtR [4,22]. We found that the consensus sequence for TTHA0167 is 5 -TGACYrnnyRGTCA-3 , which can be accommodated by the central 14 nucleotides of the TTHB023 consensus sequence in many cases.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…As TetR proteins normally exist as homodimers under physiological conditions, the location of C164 near the C-terminus suggests that it could participate in disulfide bond formation. A 2.05 Å crystal structure for SbtR presently exists (RCSB PDB 3VUQ) [ 24 ]. Its asymmetric unit is comprised of two SbtR homodimers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…used four rounds of SELEX with a C-terminal his6-tagged SbtR and PCR-generated inserts from a T . thermophilus genomic library to identify DNAs containing SbtR binding sites [ 24 ]. Of the 46 clones sequenced, 13 contained bona fide T .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%