“…Metal ion hydroxide-catalyzed specific cleavage of rRNAs was applied to the characterization of the immediate environment of high-affinity cation binding pockets and to probe the fine structure of rRNAs within the active ribosome+ For the maintainance of the structural as well as the functional integrity, ribosomes strictly require counterions, such as polyamines, mono-, and divalent metal ions+ Whereas polycations and monovalent ions are interchangeable, divalent metal ions are required absolutely and cannot be substituted without destroying the catalytic activity (for a review, see Streicher & Wallis, 1996)+ Metal ion-directed cleavage using Pb 2ϩ , as well as the functionally active ions Mg 2ϩ , Mn 2ϩ , and Ca 2ϩ , resulted in the identification of specific cleavage sites with various efficiencies+ Site-specific and strong metal hydroxide cuts are caused by ions bound tightly to binding pockets in close physical proximity to the cleavage site and depend on a correct tertiary RNA folding+ In contrast, metal ion cleavage can also be applied to probe the overall structure of RNA molecules+ In this Effects of bound AcPhe-tRNA and uncharged tRNA to the P site were quantified by using a Molecular Dynamics PhosphorImager+ The lead-cleavage efficiency of poly(U) programmed ribosomes at 10 mM Pb(OAc) 2 was taken as 100%+ Quantification was performed for six independent binding experiments+ case, the metal ions act from the solution and preferentially cleave every acessible single-stranded nucleotide with low efficiency and slow cleavage rate; this is sometimes termed "unspecific cleavage" (Pan et al+, 1993)+ Site-specific metal hydroxide-induced cleavage is considered to occur in single-stranded and flexible regions, whereas double-stranded RNA helices are known to be insensitive (Gornicki et al+, 1989;Ciesiolka et al+, 1998 ; data not shown), a pH effect can be ruled out+ Therefore, it can be concluded that the native structure was probed in all cases+ In some 2D models (Noller et al+, 1981;Brimacombe & Stiege, 1985), this region is involved in forming a helix, which should make it resistant to metal ion cleavage+ In light of our data, this region is not supposed to be base paired, a conclusion that is supported further by data showing nucleotides in that region to be highly reactive to single-strandspecific chemical probes (Egebjerg et al+, 1990) and by a structure model that depicts this region unpaired (Fig+ 2A)+ Second, two Mg 2ϩ (C2794 and G2801) and two Ca 2ϩ cuts (C2793 and G2801) in domain VI of 23S rRNA could be identified (Fig+ 2A) that are located within a helical region+ Comparative sequence analysis suggests a canonical base paired helix; however, this helix apparently adopts a structure that is accessible to site-specific cleavage, at least under the Mg 2ϩ and Hairpins, being the most abundant elements of RNA secondary structure (Woese et al+, 1990), are thought to provide nucleation points for folding and are often involved in protein recognition (Varani, 1995)+ In rRNAs, the most frequent hairpins contain the so called tetraloops of the GNRA, UNCG, and CUUG families+ The four nucleotides in the loops are structurally constrained, which explains the unusual thermodynamic stability of the hairpin+ The 70S ribosomal tetraloops were resistant to metal ion cleavage, with only two exceptions+ Two UN...…”