2009
DOI: 10.1021/jf8033682
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and Function of Starch and Resistant Starch from Corn with Different Doses of Mutant Amylose-Extender and Floury-1 Alleles

Abstract: Four corn types with different doses of mutant amylose-extender (ae) and floury-1 (fl1) alleles, in the endosperm, including no. 1, aeaeae; no. 2, fl1fl1fl1; no. 3, aeaefl1; and no. 4,fl1fl1ae, were developed for use in making Hispanic food products with high resistant starch (RS) content. The RS percentages in the native starch (NS) of 1−4 were 55.2, 1.1, 5.7, and 1.1%, respectively. All NS were evaluated for pasting properties with a rapid viscoanalyzer (RVA) and for thermal properties with a differential sc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Amylose recrystallizes quickly upon cooling, whereas amylopectin recrystallizes more slowly; thus more amylose (%) should provide greater retrogradation (%r), which did not occur in the current study. The amount of RS3 formed, however, could vary, based on the factors just mentioned, ease of granule rupture which would reduce starch realignment, and annealing during the gelatinization process (Yao et al 2009). Both parents and progeny crosses in this study showed unusual DSC peak shapes with a large amount of tailing, thus reducing the accuracy of the %r measurement and conclusions regarding RS3.…”
Section: Thermal Analyses By Dscmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Amylose recrystallizes quickly upon cooling, whereas amylopectin recrystallizes more slowly; thus more amylose (%) should provide greater retrogradation (%r), which did not occur in the current study. The amount of RS3 formed, however, could vary, based on the factors just mentioned, ease of granule rupture which would reduce starch realignment, and annealing during the gelatinization process (Yao et al 2009). Both parents and progeny crosses in this study showed unusual DSC peak shapes with a large amount of tailing, thus reducing the accuracy of the %r measurement and conclusions regarding RS3.…”
Section: Thermal Analyses By Dscmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…The second group, RS II, consists of gelatinized starch (i.e., the starch has lost its crystalline conformation and is composed primarily of amylose); this type is very common in most starchy foods (Fuentes-Zaragoza et al, 2011). Dn the other hand, RS III is formed during starch retrogradation, which occurs after manufacturing in the presence of water, cooling and storage (Sanz et al, 2009;Yao et al, 2009). Chemical modifications to produce gelling and emulsification agents result in RS IV.…”
Section: Resistant Starch (Rs)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Sang, Bean, Seib, Pedersen, and Shi (2008), starch from heterowaxy sorghum (14% amylose) had the highest amount of RS (23.7%) compared to waxy sorghum starch (0% amylose; 8.4% RS) and normal sorghum starch (23.7% amylose; 17.9% RS), indicating the significance of the amylose to amylopectin ratio with respect to the RS level. In another study of four different hybrids, aeae × aeae (high amylose); fl1fl1 × fl1fl1; aeae (female) × fl1fl1 (native) and aeae (pollen) × fl1fl1 (female), starch from self pollinated aeae produced the highest amounts of RS (55.2%) compared to the other hybrids (1-6% RS) (Yao, Paez, & White, 2009). Genotypic variations influenced RS levels in thermally processed low-(23-Am), and highamylose (67-Am) pea (Pisum sativum L).…”
Section: Effect Of Starch Composition On Rsmentioning
confidence: 97%