1994
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9258(18)99954-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and inducible regulation of the human MET promoter.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The expression of this gene has been considered, so far, mainly restricted to epithelial tissues (Prat et al, 1991a;Di Renzo et al, 1991). We recently identified in the c-MET promoter, among other consensus sequences for transcription factors, a GATA consensus motif (Gambarotta et al, 1994). The GATA-1 transcription factor is the first characterized member of a multigene family considered to be of major importance in the establishment and maintenance of the erythroid phenotype (Martin et ai., 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The expression of this gene has been considered, so far, mainly restricted to epithelial tissues (Prat et al, 1991a;Di Renzo et al, 1991). We recently identified in the c-MET promoter, among other consensus sequences for transcription factors, a GATA consensus motif (Gambarotta et al, 1994). The GATA-1 transcription factor is the first characterized member of a multigene family considered to be of major importance in the establishment and maintenance of the erythroid phenotype (Martin et ai., 1989).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recently cloned the promoter region of the HGF receptor gene (c-MET). Interestingly, a GATA-1 consensus sequence was found within 300 bp upstream from the transcription start site (Gambarotta et al, 1994). The GATA motif is known to identify genes preferentially expressed during erythroid differentiation (Martin et al, 1989).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This raises the possibility that epigenetic modifications of MET may lead to the result that MACC1 cannot transcriptionally regulate MET in PC. Third, MACC1 is not the only regulator of MET, and there are many proteins other than MACC1 that can directly regulate MET expression (e.g., HIF1, SP1, AP1, and Ets-1) [ 38 41 ], suggesting that MACC1 may not be a predominant regulator of MET in pancreatic cancer. Similar to our result, Sueta A et al reported that MACC1 cannot activate MET and that MACC1 is not a major regulator of MET in breast cancer [ 42 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It should be noted that a large dataset often restricts their analyses to protein-coding regions, overlooking important regulatory regions crucial for gene expression. The inducible nature of the MET promoter was previously described and its importance in tumor biology was established [ 149 , 150 , 151 ]. Thus, alterations affecting the MET promoter should not be disregarded: re-analyses of TCGA dataset showed a remarkable decrease in promoter methylation in cancer patients, a synonym for transcription activation and MET overexpression ( Figure 3 E).…”
Section: Genetic Alterations Of Met : the Peak Of ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the increased protein intensity is not necessarily a synonym for MET amplification and ‘addiction’. Because of the inducible nature of the MET promoter [ 149 , 150 , 151 ], high-MET-protein levels may be transient due to changes in the tumor microenvironment (e.g., hypoxia, ionizing radiation, cytotoxic reagents, described as ‘expedience’ in [ 3 ]). Indeed, post hoc analyses of some clinical trials illustrate this issue; patients with a gene copy number gain of MET > 4 exhibited the uppermost progression-free survival [ 92 ].…”
Section: Patient Stratification: a Key For Success In Targeted Therapiesmentioning
confidence: 99%