2015
DOI: 10.1039/c5ce01628b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and magnetic properties of the AB(HCO2)3 (A = Rb+ or Cs+, B = Mn2+, Co2+ or Ni2+) frameworks: probing the effect of size on the phase evolution of the ternary formates

Abstract: The AB(HCO2)3 (A = Rb+ or Cs+ & B = Mn2+, Co2+ and Ni2+) frameworks adopt either a perovskite-like or chiral hexagonal structure with dominantly antiferromagnetic interactions. This clarifies the phase evolution of the ternary formates with cation size.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
25
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
2
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Calculating these values for the four frameworks examined in this study give tolerance factors of 0.56, 0.57, 0.59, and 0.60 for LiMn(HCO 2 ) 3 , LiCo(HCO 2 ) 3 , NaMn(HCO 2 ) 3 , and NaCo(HCO 2 ) 3 , respectively, 0.56 is the smallest tolerance factor for a AB (HCO 2 ) 3 framework reported to date [Note that for consistency with previously reported tolerance factor calculations for this family of compounds we have used the ionic radii of the high spin state six‐coordinate transition metals and eight coordinate ionic radii for the alkali metals]. Comparison with the behavior of the remainder of the AB (HCO 2 ) 3 frameworks, suggests that this cubic phase is likely adopted by any other AB (HCO 2 ) 3 frameworks that form with a tolerance factor in this range. Frameworks with tolerance factors significantly higher than 0.60 most likely give rise to the polar Pna 2 1 structure adopted by NH 4 Cd(HCO 2 ) 3 , which has a tolerance factor of 0.63; this has been referred to as the so‐called Perovskite III structure, because of its resemblance to a perovskite phase with every second channel in the structure doubly occupied by the A ‐site cations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Calculating these values for the four frameworks examined in this study give tolerance factors of 0.56, 0.57, 0.59, and 0.60 for LiMn(HCO 2 ) 3 , LiCo(HCO 2 ) 3 , NaMn(HCO 2 ) 3 , and NaCo(HCO 2 ) 3 , respectively, 0.56 is the smallest tolerance factor for a AB (HCO 2 ) 3 framework reported to date [Note that for consistency with previously reported tolerance factor calculations for this family of compounds we have used the ionic radii of the high spin state six‐coordinate transition metals and eight coordinate ionic radii for the alkali metals]. Comparison with the behavior of the remainder of the AB (HCO 2 ) 3 frameworks, suggests that this cubic phase is likely adopted by any other AB (HCO 2 ) 3 frameworks that form with a tolerance factor in this range. Frameworks with tolerance factors significantly higher than 0.60 most likely give rise to the polar Pna 2 1 structure adopted by NH 4 Cd(HCO 2 ) 3 , which has a tolerance factor of 0.63; this has been referred to as the so‐called Perovskite III structure, because of its resemblance to a perovskite phase with every second channel in the structure doubly occupied by the A ‐site cations.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…The confirmation of occupational disorder of the A ‐ and B ‐site cations in the Co frameworks examined in this study is the first example of such disorder in the AB (HCO 2 ) 3 frameworks . This is likely made possible by the much smaller size of the alkali metals on the A sites in these materials.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations