2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0262-8856(02)00015-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and motion estimation from apparent contours under circular motion

Abstract: In this paper we address the problem of recovering structure and motion from the apparent contours of a smooth surface. Fixed image features under circular motion and their relationships with the intrinsic parameters of the camera are exploited to provide a simple parameterization of the fundamental matrix relating any pair of views in the sequence. Such a parameterization allows a trivial initialization of the motion parameters, which all bear physical meanings. It also greatly reduces the dimension of the se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This work presents a method for estimating the motion of an object rotating around a fixed axis from information provided by its profiles alone. It makes use of symmetry properties [41], [12], [15] of the surface of revolution swept out by the rotating object to overcome the main difficulties and drawbacks present in other methods which have attempted to estimate motion from profiles, namely, 1) the need for a very good initialization for the epipolar geometry and an unrealistic demand for a large number of epipolar tangencies [6], [2], [1] (here, as few as two epipolar tangencies are needed), 2) restriction to linear motion [31] (whereas circular motion is a more practical situation), or 3) the use of an affine approximation [39] (which may be used only for shallow scenes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This work presents a method for estimating the motion of an object rotating around a fixed axis from information provided by its profiles alone. It makes use of symmetry properties [41], [12], [15] of the surface of revolution swept out by the rotating object to overcome the main difficulties and drawbacks present in other methods which have attempted to estimate motion from profiles, namely, 1) the need for a very good initialization for the epipolar geometry and an unrealistic demand for a large number of epipolar tangencies [6], [2], [1] (here, as few as two epipolar tangencies are needed), 2) restriction to linear motion [31] (whereas circular motion is a more practical situation), or 3) the use of an affine approximation [39] (which may be used only for shallow scenes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [9], we extended the algorithm presented in [8] to cope with incomplete circular motion and more widely space images. However, there are two main drawbacks of using circular motion: 1) new views cannot be added easily at a later time, and 2) part of the structure will always remain invisible under circular motion.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system first employs our previous technique [9] for estimating the circular motion of an object from its profiles alone, and builds an initial 3D model of the object by an octree carving technique [10] using the profiles and the estimated camera positions. The system then allows the 3D model thus obtained to be refined incrementally by adding new arbitrary general views of the object and estimating the corresponding camera positions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the works showing, both sparse features and dense features are used to establish corresponds between consecutive frames from input image sequence. Some of the most common choices are point [33], lines [34], contour [35], and hybrid [36], which can be tracked in both spatial and temporal domains. Point feature is the most commonly used of all, because of its simplicity.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%