The constant improvement of hydrotreating (HDT) catalysts, driven by industrial and environmental needs, requires a better understanding of the interactions between the oxide support (mostly alumina) and the MoS 2 active phase. Hence, this work addresses the supportdependent genesis of MoS 2 on four planar, single crystal -Al 2 O 3 surfaces with different crystal orientations (C (0001), R , M and A). In contrast to classical surface science techniques, which often rely on UHV-type deposition methods, the Mo is introduced by impregnation from an aqueous solution, in order to mimic the standard incipient wetness impregnation. Comparison between different preparation routes, impregnation vs. equilibrium adsorption (selective adsorption), is also considered. AFM, XAS, TEM and XPS show that the -Al 2 O 3 orientation has a clear impact on the strength of metal-support interactions at the oxide state with consequences on the sulfidation, size, stacking and orientation of MoS 2 slabs. Aggregation of molybdenum oxide particles is observed on the C (0001) plane suggesting weak metal-support interactions leading to high sulfidation degree with large slabs. Conversely, the presence of well-dispersed individual oxide particles on the R plane implies stronger metal-support interactions leading to a low sulfidation degree and shorter MoS 2 slabs. Both A and M facets, of similar crystallographic structure, display an intermediate behaviors in terms of sulfidation rate and MoS 2 size in line with intermediary metal-support interactions. Polarization-dependent Grazing-Incidence-EXAFS experiments as well as HR HAADF-STEM analysis allow us to demonstrate a surface-dependent orientation of MoS 2 slabs. A predominant basal bonding is suggested on the C (0001) plane in agreement with the existence of weak metal-support interactions. Conversely, a random orientation (edge and basal-bonding) is observed for the other planes. Generalization of these conclusions to industrial catalysts is proposed based on the comparison of the surface structure of the various model -Al 2 O 3 orientations used in this work and the predominantly exposed -Al 2 O 3 surfaces ((110), (100) and (111)).