2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2012.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and properties of a non-traditional glass containing TeO2, SeO2 and MoO3

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
3
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The new peaks at 575.6 and 585.9 eV were corresponding to the TeO 3 2– . Therefore, the Te 2– in QDs was also oxidized to TeO 3 2– by H 2 O 2 . , As shown in Figure S8, the fluorescence lifetime of QDs was nearly invariant before and after adding H 2 O 2 . The UV–vis absorption spectra, XPS, and fluorescence decay curves indicated that the mechanism of fluorescence quenching of QDs was in accord with that of static quenching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The new peaks at 575.6 and 585.9 eV were corresponding to the TeO 3 2– . Therefore, the Te 2– in QDs was also oxidized to TeO 3 2– by H 2 O 2 . , As shown in Figure S8, the fluorescence lifetime of QDs was nearly invariant before and after adding H 2 O 2 . The UV–vis absorption spectra, XPS, and fluorescence decay curves indicated that the mechanism of fluorescence quenching of QDs was in accord with that of static quenching.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The broad peak at around 59.2 eV is attributed to the oxidized Se species such as the SeO 2 impurity. 57 However, these peaks are observable in as-grown but not in HBr-treated MoSe 2 layers. It is known that HBr is able to remove the oxygen in SeO 2 through the formation of SeBr 4 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The signals for all three samples are fit with two individual peaks (at 529.2–529.3 and 531.6–531.8 eV), both of which are stronger in the CdCl 2 ‐treated sample. The lower energy peak is in the typical binding energy range for nonbridging metaloxide bonds, while the higher energy peak is in the range for bridging metal–oxygen–metal bonds . Further identification of the two (or more) environments is not possible since the chemical shifts are not sufficiently different to allow it.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that depth profi les were repeated on separate regions of all samples and this accumulation was again (and only) seen in the CdCl 2 -treated sample. [ 58,59 ] Further identifi cation of the two (or more) environments is not possible since the chemical shifts are not suffi ciently different to allow it. In this case, the O accumulation at the CdTe-CdS interface for the CdCl 2treated sample suggests that the out-diffusion mechanism into the CdTe is restricted.…”
Section: Chemical Analysis Of Cdte Surface and Device Stackmentioning
confidence: 99%