2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssi.2013.01.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and properties of perovskites for SOFC cathodes as a function of the A-site cation size disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(Table 4) The electrical conductivities obtained are comparable with those previously reported for this type of perovskite material with high σ 2 (r A ) values [7,11]. However, in this study, a slight decrease in electrical conductivity was observed for the sample with G/N = 2 when a current of 100 mA was applied.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…(Table 4) The electrical conductivities obtained are comparable with those previously reported for this type of perovskite material with high σ 2 (r A ) values [7,11]. However, in this study, a slight decrease in electrical conductivity was observed for the sample with G/N = 2 when a current of 100 mA was applied.…”
Section: Electrical Conductivity Studysupporting
confidence: 88%
“…As have been studied for similar compositions with high values of σ 2 (r A ) [11,12], the Rp values are very sensitive to changes in applied currents. Figure 13 shows the typical Nyquist diagram of the impedance spectroscopy for Samples with G/N = 1 and 2 at 800°C at OCP and under a current of 50 and 100 mA.…”
Section: Electrochemical Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…8 shows the typical electrochemical impedance spectra measured at 700 and 800 C for the MCT3 and MCT10 samples. The high frequency intercept of the impedance arcs with the x axis corresponds to the ohmic resistance (R s ), which is generally attributed to the electrolyte and the contact resistance [52]. In the present case, R s were in different ranges due to the electrolyte thickness variability.…”
Section: Evaluation Of a Multilayered Symmetric Systemmentioning
confidence: 64%