1990
DOI: 10.1016/1044-5803(90)90056-p
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure and property evolution during drawing and wall ironing of aluminum alloy 3004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Modeling of in-plane anisotropy, with crystallographic texture, precipitate volume fractions, grain morphology and the associated grain aspect ratio as the major variables has been undertaken [18]. Crystallographic texture has both direct and indirect effects on the plastic anisotropy of aluminum alloys [19][20][21]. Direct effects are due to the orientation of the crystals and slip systems with respect to applied stresses and grain morphologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modeling of in-plane anisotropy, with crystallographic texture, precipitate volume fractions, grain morphology and the associated grain aspect ratio as the major variables has been undertaken [18]. Crystallographic texture has both direct and indirect effects on the plastic anisotropy of aluminum alloys [19][20][21]. Direct effects are due to the orientation of the crystals and slip systems with respect to applied stresses and grain morphologies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The total area percent reduction of 52% mentioned in Merchant's work is approximate to the 48% used in the present work for the redraw operation. This rotation/alignment with the flow (ironing) direction is also mentioned in relation to microbands detected at the top wall of the can after the 3 rd ironing operation before the metal is heated in the curing oven 15 . A possible explanation for the rotating pole figures is the gradual alignment of the grains with the metal flow direction, which would continue if extra ironing operation were to happen.…”
Section: Alloymentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It was measured cross-rolling to 45° and 90°, showing that the smaller is the cross-rolling angle, the smaller is the deformation required to recover the typical aluminum deformation texture. Besides this, the alignment of the grain with the flow direction is mentioned by Merchant when observing the microstructure resulting from the second draw, here called redraw (2 nd stage) 15 . The total area percent reduction of 52% mentioned in Merchant's work is approximate to the 48% used in the present work for the redraw operation.…”
Section: Alloymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations