The reaction of H-atoms with sulfinyl sulfides RS(CH2)
n
SOR‘ (R, R‘ = alkyl) in strongly acidic aqueous
medium leads, among other reactions, to the reduction of the sulfoxide moiety. This results in the formation
of a S•+ radical cation entity which coordinates with the original sulfide moiety to yield the (>S∴S<)+
three-electron-bonded 2σ/1σ* radical cation. The optical properties of this reductively generated species are
identical to those for the transients obtained previously upon one-electron oxidation of dithiaalkanes. At sulfinyl
sulfide concentrations in the 10-4−10-2 M range the H•-atom-induced process occurs intramolecularly. The
most stable three-electron-bonded radical cation is formed when the two interacting sulfurs are linked via a
−(CH2)3− chain and a five-membered ring structure can be established. The yields of the (>S∴S<)+-type
transients range from G = 0.2−0.7 (species per 10 J absorbed energy) with the high value pertaining to the
reduction of MeS(CH3)3SOMe (0.01 M) in aqueous, N2-purged, 3 M HClO4 solutions. These yields are
significantly below the yield of H•-atoms, indicating competing processes such as H-atom abstraction and
reaction of H• with 2-methyl-2-propanol (which was added for removal of •OH radicals). The rate constant
estimate of (1.8 ± 0.2) × 107 M-1 s-1 for the reaction of H• +MeS(CH2)3SOMe appears to be typical with
respect to the order of magnitude for the H•-induced reduction of the sulfoxide moiety. Electrochemical cyclic
voltammetry experiments on the oxidation of RS(CH2)
n
SR‘, RS(CH2)
n
SOR‘, RSO(CH2)
n
SOR‘, and RS(CH2)
n
SO2R‘ showed relatively little influence of the sulfur-linking alkyl chain length and the nature of the terminal
alkyl substituents except for the dithiaalkanes. This may indicate the lack of any significant electronic interaction
between the S and SO moieties in the alkylsulfinyl sulfides, SO and SO, in the bis(alkylsulfinyl)alkanes, and
S and SO2 in the alkylsulfonyl sulfides. The electrochemical data further suggest that, concerning RS(CH2)
n
SOR‘, the lower oxidation potential pertains to the oxidation of the sulfide moiety (yielding RSO(CH2)
n
SOR‘). The SO → SO2 oxidation, on the other hand, requires potentials which are more positive by about 0.2
V. It appears that the RS(CH2)3SOR‘ → RS(CH2)3SO2R‘ oxidation prevails when R‘ is electron density releasing,
while an electron density releasing R favors the RS(CH2)
n
SOR‘ → RSO(CH2)3SOR‘ oxidation.