2019
DOI: 10.2174/1568026619666181224101744
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-based Methods for Binding Mode and Binding Affinity Prediction for Peptide-MHC Complexes

Abstract: Understanding the mechanisms involved in the activation of an immune response is essential to many fields in human health, including vaccine development and personalized cancer immunotherapy. A central step in the activation of the adaptive immune response is the recognition, by T-cell lymphocytes, of peptides displayed by a special type of receptor known as Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC). Considering the key role of MHC receptors in T-cell activation, the computational prediction of peptide binding to… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
71
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 166 publications
(233 reference statements)
0
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, a similar work on TCR-peptide interaction does not yet exist. Comparing motifs between TCR and antibodyantigen motifs would shed light on mechanistic similarities and differences in antibody and TCR antigen-interaction (Antunes et al, 2018;Bradley and Thomas, 2019;Dash et al, 2017;Glanville et al, 2017;Gowthaman and Pierce, 2018;Hellman et al, 2019Hellman et al, , 2019Lanzarotti et al, 2018;Ostmeyer et al, 2019;Riley and Baker, 2018;Turner et al, 2006). Furthermore, it remains to be investigated in how far the motif-based rules uncovered here for VH-VL-antigen complexes are transferable to scFV, nanobody, and other novel antibody constructs (Henry and MacKenzie, 2018;Mitchell and Colwell, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To our knowledge, a similar work on TCR-peptide interaction does not yet exist. Comparing motifs between TCR and antibodyantigen motifs would shed light on mechanistic similarities and differences in antibody and TCR antigen-interaction (Antunes et al, 2018;Bradley and Thomas, 2019;Dash et al, 2017;Glanville et al, 2017;Gowthaman and Pierce, 2018;Hellman et al, 2019Hellman et al, , 2019Lanzarotti et al, 2018;Ostmeyer et al, 2019;Riley and Baker, 2018;Turner et al, 2006). Furthermore, it remains to be investigated in how far the motif-based rules uncovered here for VH-VL-antigen complexes are transferable to scFV, nanobody, and other novel antibody constructs (Henry and MacKenzie, 2018;Mitchell and Colwell, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Structure-based predictions are another option that can improve the state of the art in the context of neoantigen discovery [ 61 , 162 ]. While the genomics-based approach utilizes sequence-based methods, the structure-based prediction is additionally capable of uncovering the significance of peptide structure and physicochemical properties, as well as the importance of post-translational modifications, such as phosphorylation [ 163 ], citrullination [ 164 ], and glycosylation [ 165 ], for peptide binding to the MHC and the TCR.…”
Section: Structure-based Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modification of native peptides alters the way peptides interact with TCR and, therefore, influences subsequent T cell activation and T cell fate. Increasing knowledge of both MHC binding registers and TCR interacting residues of peptides allowed the development of altered peptide ligands (APL), with the aim of favoring the expansion and/or induction of Tregs upon peptide recognition [reviewed in ( 72 , 73 )]. Following studies in murine disease models, showing that specific APLs were capable of eliciting cytokine release and affecting T cell polarization ( 74 , 75 ), APLs were tested in vivo in autoimmune diseases.…”
Section: Cell Free Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%