2008
DOI: 10.1021/ja805258z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Determination of Protein−Protein Complexes Using NMR Chemical Shifts: Case of an Endonuclease Colicin−Immunity Protein Complex

Abstract: Nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy provides a range of powerful techniques for determining the structures and the dynamics of proteins. The high-resolution determination of the structures of protein-protein complexes, however, is still a challenging problem for this approach, since it can normally provide only a limited amount of structural information at protein-protein interfaces. We present here the determination using NMR chemical shifts of the structure (PDB code 2K5X) of the cytotoxic endonucl… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
56
0
6

Year Published

2009
2009
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
1
56
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…To address this problem, we built on recent findings that NMR structure determination of monomers can be greatly accelerated by coupling de novo modeling with backbone chemical shift data without further NOE, scalar coupling, residual dipolar coupling (RDC), or isotope-edited measurements (24,25). The structure of a dimeric complex was recently predicted from models of monomeric components generated using chemical shift fragments (26). We brought together the chemical-shiftderived fragment method with our symmetric folding-and-docking method to model eight complexes under investigation by the Northeast Structural Genomics consortium (NESG; Table 1).…”
Section: Inference Of Oligomeric Protein Structure From Chemical Shifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address this problem, we built on recent findings that NMR structure determination of monomers can be greatly accelerated by coupling de novo modeling with backbone chemical shift data without further NOE, scalar coupling, residual dipolar coupling (RDC), or isotope-edited measurements (24,25). The structure of a dimeric complex was recently predicted from models of monomeric components generated using chemical shift fragments (26). We brought together the chemical-shiftderived fragment method with our symmetric folding-and-docking method to model eight complexes under investigation by the Northeast Structural Genomics consortium (NESG; Table 1).…”
Section: Inference Of Oligomeric Protein Structure From Chemical Shifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…65 We have developed a computer code called CamDock to enable the structures of protein-protein complexes to be determined by combining advanced docking methods 53 with the information provided by chemical shifts 53 and residual dipolar couplings. 66 It is then of very great importance to be able to relate the principles that emerge from studies in the test tube to analogous events occurring in the cell.…”
Section: Multiple Forms Of Protein Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important consequence of exosite binding is that much of the sequence diversity in these proteins is found at the protein-protein interface, 23 a result of the positive selection for novel colicin DNase-Im variants between competing bacterial populations. These properties, along with the extensive characterization of colicin DNase-Im protein complexes reported in the literature, have led to their being adopted as a model system for investigating the coevolution of PPIs, 24 the development of NMR-based methods for structure determination of PPIs, 25 testing of the latest methodologies for computational docking of PPIs, 26 molecular dynamics simulations to follow PPI association, 27 and the directed evolution and design of PPI specificity. 4,[28][29][30] Cognate colicin DNase-Im protein complexes are high-affinity PPIs, exhibiting K d values of ∼10 − 14 -10 − 16 M, while noncognate complexes, which also inhibit nuclease activity, display binding that is 6-10 orders of magnitude weaker.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%