1976
DOI: 10.1039/c39760000435
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure determination of two extractives from Aspergillus amstelodami by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Abstract: Spectral evidence supports the assignment of structures (1) and (2) to two substances extracted from the mycelium of Aspergillus amstelodami; they can be obtained by thermal condensation of auroglaucine with neoechinuline B and neoechinuline C, respectively, which are all known metabolites of the fungus.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1979
1979
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The HRESIMS spectrum of compound 1 suggested a molecular formula of C 43 H 49 N 3 O 5 (calcd for C 43 H 49 N 3 NaO 5 , 710.3564), which corresponds to 21 double-bond equivalents. An analysis of the 1 H and 13 C-NMR data together with the DEPT and HSQC data (Supplementary Data S1-S6) led to the identification of 1 as a known compound, cryptoechinuline B [15]. A direct comparison of the NMR data of 1 with literature data [15,16] confirmed the full identity of the planar structure of 1.…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of Compounds 1-7mentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The HRESIMS spectrum of compound 1 suggested a molecular formula of C 43 H 49 N 3 O 5 (calcd for C 43 H 49 N 3 NaO 5 , 710.3564), which corresponds to 21 double-bond equivalents. An analysis of the 1 H and 13 C-NMR data together with the DEPT and HSQC data (Supplementary Data S1-S6) led to the identification of 1 as a known compound, cryptoechinuline B [15]. A direct comparison of the NMR data of 1 with literature data [15,16] confirmed the full identity of the planar structure of 1.…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of Compounds 1-7mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…An analysis of the 1 H and 13 C-NMR data together with the DEPT and HSQC data (Supplementary Data S1-S6) led to the identification of 1 as a known compound, cryptoechinuline B [15]. A direct comparison of the NMR data of 1 with literature data [15,16] confirmed the full identity of the planar structure of 1. The optical rotation of 1 was near zero, indicating that 1 was a racemic mixture.…”
Section: Isolation and Identification Of Compounds 1-7mentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Another proton with HMBC correlations with C-2 (δ C 141.4), C-3 (δ C 104.1), C-8 (δ C 128.9), and C-9 (δ C 132.2) was located on a N atom in an indole ring. These data and the presence of a α,α-dimethylallyl group (δ H 1.51, 6H, δ C 27.8, 27.9; δ H 5.15, 2H, m, δ C 112.3; δ H 6.10, 1H, dd, δ C 145.7) and two isopentenyl substituents indicated that 4 belonged to the echinulin series of metabolites, which are characteristic of certain higher plants and fungi [14][15][16][17][18]. The mass spectrum, NMR spectra, and specific rotation were in excellent agreement with those of echinulin isolated from higher plants [14].…”
Section: Metabolites From the Marine Fungusmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In addition, eight known dioxopiperazine derivatives, including variecolorin L (3) [8], echinulin (4) [9], isoechinulin A (5) [10], dihydroxyisoechinulin A (6) [4], preechinulin (7) [11], neoechinulin A (8) [12], neoechinulin E (9) [12], and cryptoechinuline D (10) [13], were also isolated and identified. It deserves to be mentioned that just at the time when we started to prepare this manuscript, compound 3 was reported as a new metabolite of Aspergillus variecolor B-17, a halotolerant fungal strain isolated from a sediment collection of a salt field in inner Mongolia, China [8].…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This observation was supported by the fact that the aliphatic CH 2 and CH groups at d(C) 30.3 and 55.6 (for C (8) and C(9), resp.) in the 13 C-NMR spectrum of 3 were replaced by the olefinic CH group and quaternary C-atom at d(C) 114.9 (C(8)) and 128.1 (C(9)), respectively, in the (Table). Detailed examination of the NMR spectral data and comparison with those reported for echinulin (4, Table) [9] showed that the structures of these two compounds are very similar.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%