“…Mercury (Hg) emission during fossil fuel consumption has posed a threat to the global environment due to its high toxicity and bioaccumulation ability. − To date, Hg removal methods, such as coal washing, thermal coal treatment, adsorption, and catalytic oxidation, have been widely studied. − Among them, the catalytic oxidation has been considered to be an effective approach to the Hg elimination. , Generally, Hg in flue gas can exist as both elemental Hg (Hg 0 ) and oxidized Hg (Hg 2+ ) in compounds, and the oxidation state of Hg is known to critically affect the efficiency of Hg removal in the flue gas treatment facility; Hg 0 is highly volatile and insoluble in water (∼50 μg/L), not being effectively eliminated, while Hg 2+ is soluble in water and can be easily removed by wet flue gas desulfurization systems. , Among many, the selective catalytic reduction (SCR) catalysts, such as TiO 2 -supported vanadia (VO x /TiO 2 ), have attracted extensive attention owing to their catalytic and economic efficiency; the use of V 2 O 5 /TiO 2 catalysts has been shown to be effective in promoting Hg oxidation under specific reaction conditions . These conditions typically include a high temperature of 623 K and the presence of oxidizing agents, such as oxygen or chlorine . Not only is the SCR catalyst active to both the Hg oxidation and NO x reduction, but also it can utilize the hydrochloric acid (HCl) species as a specific oxidant, which is produced by NO x reduction with ammonium chloride (NH 4 Cl) .…”