2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, Dynamics, and Membrane Topology of Stannin: A Mediator of Neuronal Cell Apoptosis Induced by Trimethyltin Chloride

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 87 publications
0
35
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is not surprising, as it is reasonably because of the different model used (transformed cell line in vitro vs. hippocampal lesions in vivo), based on different methodologies (Affymetrix expression array covering over 15.866 transcripts vs. Atlas membrane arrays representing 1176 genes) and experimental conditions along with different species (rat vs. mouse). In addition, there are some differences between the results here reported and the common molecular alterations described by other Authors in TMT toxicity models (mainly based on neuronal cultures or selected brain sections), such as caspases activation, stannin overexpression and the involvement of common signal transduction pathways (Pavlakovic et al 1995;Kane et al 1998;Gunasekar et al 2001;Jenkins and Barone 2004;Buck-Koehntop et al 2005). This could be likely related to the inherent differences between un-primed PC12 cells and primary neuronal cultures or hippocampal sections, which are commonly used to describe the neuro-specific effects of TMT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…This is not surprising, as it is reasonably because of the different model used (transformed cell line in vitro vs. hippocampal lesions in vivo), based on different methodologies (Affymetrix expression array covering over 15.866 transcripts vs. Atlas membrane arrays representing 1176 genes) and experimental conditions along with different species (rat vs. mouse). In addition, there are some differences between the results here reported and the common molecular alterations described by other Authors in TMT toxicity models (mainly based on neuronal cultures or selected brain sections), such as caspases activation, stannin overexpression and the involvement of common signal transduction pathways (Pavlakovic et al 1995;Kane et al 1998;Gunasekar et al 2001;Jenkins and Barone 2004;Buck-Koehntop et al 2005). This could be likely related to the inherent differences between un-primed PC12 cells and primary neuronal cultures or hippocampal sections, which are commonly used to describe the neuro-specific effects of TMT.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 73%
“…63 The SNN gene encodes the stannin protein, a highly conserved, 88-amino acid small protein. 64 WNK1, also known as WNK lysine deficient protein kinase 1, encodes a cytoplasmic serine-threonine kinase that is expressed in the distal nephron. 65 The ABCA1 gene encodes ATP-binding cassette transporter ABCA1, which is a major regulator of cellular cholesterol and phospholipid homeostasis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these two conditions, the pattern of NOE peaks for each residue is identical in both number and intensity of the NOE cross-peaks, confirming that the protein fold is not affected by the presence of the micelle and the lipid anchor. We titrated the lipidated rLP2086-B01 with the paramagnetic reagent 5-doxyl stearic acid, which reconstitutes into the micelle, inducing selective paramagnetic broadening of residues bound to the micellar surface (33,34). With the exception of Cys 1 and Gly 2 (supplemental Fig.…”
Section: Solution Structure Of the Nonlipidated Lp2086 Variant B01-mentioning
confidence: 99%