2018
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b01296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure Effects of 2D Materials on α-Nickel Hydroxide for Oxygen Evolution Reaction

Abstract: To engineer low-cost, high-efficiency, and stable oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts, structure effects should be primarily understood. Focusing on this, we systematically investigated the relationship between structures of materials and their OER performances by taking four 2D α-Ni(OH) as model materials, including layer-stacked bud-like Ni(OH)-NB, flower-like Ni(OH)-NF, and petal-like Ni(OH)-NP as well as the ultralarge sheet-like Ni(OH)-NS. For the first three (layer-stacking) catalysts, with the dec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
116
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 192 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
(97 reference statements)
3
116
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The overpotential at 10 mA cm À2 , which is the approximate j for a 10% efficiency solar-to-fuel conversion device, was 290 mV, 289 mV, 343 mV, 347 mV, and 389 mV for SAV-NiCu x LDH, NiCu(I) LDH, NiCu LDH, Ni(OH) 2 and Ni foam, respectively (Fig. S13 †) with the prepared SAV-NiCu x LDH and NiCu(I) LDH showing the most smaller overpotentials that were even smaller than those of noble-metal catalysts of IrO 2 (350 mV) [42][43][44][45] and RuO 2 (365 mV) 46,47 (Fig. S14 †).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The overpotential at 10 mA cm À2 , which is the approximate j for a 10% efficiency solar-to-fuel conversion device, was 290 mV, 289 mV, 343 mV, 347 mV, and 389 mV for SAV-NiCu x LDH, NiCu(I) LDH, NiCu LDH, Ni(OH) 2 and Ni foam, respectively (Fig. S13 †) with the prepared SAV-NiCu x LDH and NiCu(I) LDH showing the most smaller overpotentials that were even smaller than those of noble-metal catalysts of IrO 2 (350 mV) [42][43][44][45] and RuO 2 (365 mV) 46,47 (Fig. S14 †).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 However, it shows low electrochemical performance due to its poor electronic conductivity and a small number of active sites. 20 To improve the electrocatalytic performance, various strategies are used such as doping the transition metals such as V, Fe, Co, 3,17,18 or hybridizing the conductive substrate using carbon nanotube, 21 and graphene derivatives. 22,23 For instance, the V doped Ni(OH) 2 nanostructure was prepared using the chemical bath deposition technique, which showed enhanced OER performance with overpotential of 268 mV @10 mA cm −2 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The spherical, hollow and polyhedral Co 3 Mo 3 N was also used as a catalysis for OER, owing to the active sites on the inner and outer surfaces. The ultra‐thin Ni(OH) 2 and CoFe 2 O 4 nanosheets can also produce high performance catalysis, because of the rich marginal active sites. The ordered arrays were helpful to the electron transfer in the catalytic reaction .…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%