2012
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-24834-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure from Motion using the Extended Kalman Filter

Abstract: The use of general descriptive names, registered names, trademarks, etc. in this publication does not imply, even in the absence of a specific statement, that such names are exempt from the relevant protective laws and regulations and therefore free for general use.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The flow chart has four major realms that have both RPAS and engineering geological units: (i) preparation, (ii) field survey, (iii) data processing and calculation and (iv) interpretation. The RPAS line is described in detail in the next part of the paper, but is also linked to previous publications providing overview of image acquisition, image processing and interpretation (Civera et al, 2012;Westoby et al, 2012;Remondino et al, 2014). The engineering geological part of the flow chart is also explained below and has strong links to publications describing the application of RPAS to landslide characterization and rock slope stability assessment (Niethammer et al, 2012;Tannant, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flow chart has four major realms that have both RPAS and engineering geological units: (i) preparation, (ii) field survey, (iii) data processing and calculation and (iv) interpretation. The RPAS line is described in detail in the next part of the paper, but is also linked to previous publications providing overview of image acquisition, image processing and interpretation (Civera et al, 2012;Westoby et al, 2012;Remondino et al, 2014). The engineering geological part of the flow chart is also explained below and has strong links to publications describing the application of RPAS to landslide characterization and rock slope stability assessment (Niethammer et al, 2012;Tannant, 2015).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Semantic information can also be added to the map by object-template matching. Civera et al [17] match the map points created using a monocular SLAM system against a known database of objects, which upon recognition using a feature based methods, can be inserted into the map. This creates more complete maps and allows for scale resolution.…”
Section: A Semantic Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When landmarks are static, the prediction involves estimating the camera and its covariance with cross-covariance [4]. As we transfer the camera state directly in to the reduced state x t , camera parameters can be predicted in the usual manner while keeping x y t unchanged to get the predicted state x t|(t−1) .…”
Section: Prediction In the Reduced Spacementioning
confidence: 99%