Structure internal of the dimension Human Person of the Questionnaire of Health Vulnerability in Heart Failure

Cestari, Virna Ribeiro Feitosa; Borges, José Wicto Pereira; Florêncio, Raquel Sampaio; Garcês, Thiago Santos; Pessoa, Vera Lúcia Mendes de Paula; Moreira, Thereza Maria Magalhães

doi:10.1590/1980-220x-reeusp-2022-0117en

Cited by 4 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…EFA validation of its internal structure represents the degree to which the correlation between the items typically reflects the construct measured by the test. For instance, it informs the measurement precision of the instrument, ensuring that what was measured in a sample reflects the data of a given population [26,36].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal Structure of the Brazilian Online Version of the Childbirth Fear Prior to Pregnancy Scale

Mizobata,

Castro,

de Lima Parada

et al. 2024

TONURSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Approximately 80% of pregnant women have some degree of childbirth fear, which can have short- and long-term negative effects when not correctly identified and managed. Therefore, it is essential to assess childbirth fear to measure and identify factors related to this fear. Furthermore, it is crucial to develop appropriate and early interventions to improve the childbirth experience for women and their families, including the obstetric care provided. Objective This study aimed to assess the validity of the internal structure of the Brazilian online version of the Childbirth Fear Prior to Pregnancy (CFPP) scale. Methods This methodological study was conducted to assess the validity of the internal structure of the Brazilian online version of the CFPP scale. A total of 553 men and women aged 18 or older participated in the study. The participants were not pregnant at the time of data collection but intended to have children in the future. A combination of Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analyses were used for statistical analysis. Reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s Alpha and McDonald’s Omega indicators. The Research Ethics Committee approved the study (protocol no: 4.961.821.) Results The psychometric parameters indicated a unidimensional model with adequate factor loadings (0.47–0.73) and reliability (0.86). Goodness of fit was achieved (χ2/df = 1.5, NNFI = 0.97, CFI = 0.98, GFI = 0.98, and SRMR = 0.06). Conclusion The Brazilian online version of the CFPP scale showed evidence of internal structural validity and reliability for measuring the construct in the population of this country.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Internal Structure of the Brazilian Online Version of the Childbirth Fear Prior to Pregnancy Scale

Mizobata,

Castro,

de Lima Parada

et al. 2024

TONURSJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…(5)(6)(7)14) Verificou-se também que alguns instrumentos têm trabalhado com dimensões individuais e com outros tipos de validade, por meio da comparação com outros instrumentos já criados (15,16) ou utilizando validações por meio da análise fatorial. (17) Em revisão sobre índices sintéticos, (3) aqueles que foram selecionados puderam ser classificados em quatro categorias temáticas a depender da sua abordagem prevalecente: índices sintéticos de vulnerabilidade sob a perspectiva dos determinantes sociais da saúde; socioambiental e das condições climáticas; da família e do curso da vida; e de um território e espaços geográficos específicos. Os estudos analisaram tanto dados primários, levantados por meio de pes-Tabela 2.…”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Health vulnerability: evidence of validity of an item bank

Florêncio,

Cestari,

Azevedo

et al. 2024

Acta Paul Enferm

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To analyze the evidence of content validity and response process of a health vulnerability item bank. Methods: Psychometric study with support of Pasquali’s theoretical pole in which 62 specialists with different sociodemographic and academic characteristics were selected and 15 of them responded to the content validity questionnaire. After adjustments, the bank moved to the response process validity phase and was evaluated by 12 health service users. A content validity coefficient was used to evaluate the items and the bank, which had the reliability assessed by the binomial test, considering a percentage of 80% and p-value >0.05. Results: The bank presented good evidence of content validity by experts. The coefficients were 0.87 for the subject element, 0.86 for the social element and 0.865 for the general element. The target audience made suggestions in the response process validity phase to better understand the items (total coefficient: 0.89), which were considered clear, accurate and understandable. Conclusion: The final version of the item bank has 535 items, 238 for the subject and 297 for the social element. It presents evidence of validity of content and response process and is suitable for testing the validity of internal structure.

show abstract

Section: Discussionunclassified

Vulnerabilidade em saúde: evidências de validade de um banco de itens

Florêncio,

Cestari,

Azevedo

et al. 2024

Acta Paulista De Enfermagem

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Conflitos de interesse: nada a declarar. ResumoObjetivo: Analisar as evidências de validade de conteúdo e processo de resposta de um banco de itens sobre vulnerabilidade em saúde.Métodos: Estudo psicométrico, subsidiado pelo polo teórico de Pasquali. Foram selecionados 62 especialistas com características sociodemográficas e acadêmicas distintas. Desses, 15 responderam ao questionário de validade de conteúdo. Após os ajustes, o banco passou para fase de validade de processo de resposta e foi avaliado por 12 usuários dos serviços de saúde. Utilizou-se coeficiente de validade de conteúdo para avaliação dos itens e do banco, cuja confiabilidade foi verificada pelo teste binomial, considerando percentual de 80% e p-valor >0,05.Resultados: O banco apresentou boa evidência de validade de conteúdo pelos especialistas, cujos coeficientes foram 0,87 para o elemento sujeito, 0,86 para o elemento social e 0,865 para o geral. O público-alvo realizou sugestões na fase de validade de processo de resposta para melhor compreensão dos itens (coeficiente total: 0,89), sendo considerado, claro, preciso e compreensível.Conclusão: A versão final do banco de itens possui 535 itens, sendo 238 para o sujeito e 297 para o social. Apresenta indícios de evidência de validade de conteúdo e processo de resposta e está apto para testagem de validade de estrutura interna.

show abstract

Structure internal of the dimension Human Person of the Questionnaire of Health Vulnerability in Heart Failure

Cited by 4 publications

References 28 publications

Internal Structure of the Brazilian Online Version of the Childbirth Fear Prior to Pregnancy Scale

Internal Structure of the Brazilian Online Version of the Childbirth Fear Prior to Pregnancy Scale

Health vulnerability: evidence of validity of an item bank

Vulnerabilidade em saúde: evidências de validade de um banco de itens

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About