2008
DOI: 10.1063/1.3027066
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure map for embedded binary alloy nanocrystals

Abstract: The equilibrium structure of embedded nanocrystals formed from strongly segregating binaryalloys is considered within a simple thermodynamic model. The model identifies two dimensionless interface energies that dictate the structure, and allows prediction of the stable structure for any choice of these parameters. The resulting structure map includes three distinct nanocrystal morphologies: core/shell, lobe/lobe, and completely separated spheres.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Inspired by a simple thermodynamic model, we aimed at calculating the specific shape of a Cu–Ag crescent and the energy difference between various geometries. While the model described in ref is general, we apply this model to our specific Cu–Ag system.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Inspired by a simple thermodynamic model, we aimed at calculating the specific shape of a Cu–Ag crescent and the energy difference between various geometries. While the model described in ref is general, we apply this model to our specific Cu–Ag system.…”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As such, we decided to investigate whether the formation of bimetallic NCs of Cu and Ag can be predicted with a simple thermodynamic model focused on surface and interface effects. We have revisited models studying wetting in multiphase systems to probe how the geometry of Cu and Ag domains in a nanoparticle is primarily determined by the ratio of surface and interface energies. Here, surface energy refers to the energy needed to create a boundary between a solid and a vapor, while interface energy is the cost to create an interface between two different solids .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From that we calculated the value of 1 and 2 using the relation shown in the text ((Equation 1and 2)). The notations are per the reference [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To check whether the bi-lobed structures are equilibrium structures or not, we calculated the 1 and 2 values for the bi-lobed structures and applied the formulas used by the Yuan et al [38] in their calculation. The value of the 1 (= 1.05) and 2 (= 1.07) were well matched with the studied done by Yuan et al [38]. So these Au-Ge bilobed structures are most likely the equilibrium structures.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, a method for determining interfacial free energies within BEANs is proposed. Specifically, the equilibrium geometry of a BEAN is determined by the relevant interfacial free energies, 12 and characterization of this geometry enables one to deduce ratios of the relevant interfacial free energies. These ratios, when combined with experimental results for bulk alloys, provide a measure of interfacial free energy.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%