2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.matdes.2009.07.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, microstructure and mechanical properties of PM Fe–Cu–Co alloys

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
3
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained by considering two aspects: (1) poor adhesion due to the absence of a coating on diamonds, (2) low compatibility iron/ diamond, especially in the absence of the elements already established for the diamond adhesion, such as cobalt and nickel. These explanations are in agreement with works 6,[19][20][21] . Figure 10 shows points analyzed by EDS.…”
Section: Compression Testssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This can be explained by considering two aspects: (1) poor adhesion due to the absence of a coating on diamonds, (2) low compatibility iron/ diamond, especially in the absence of the elements already established for the diamond adhesion, such as cobalt and nickel. These explanations are in agreement with works 6,[19][20][21] . Figure 10 shows points analyzed by EDS.…”
Section: Compression Testssupporting
confidence: 94%
“…This Cu effect is also verified for samples hot pressed at 35MPa/800 C/3 minutes -see NEXT100 versus Cobalite HDR and DIABASE V07. This Cu liquid phase aids someway the Fe-Co solid solution formation, as stated by Barbosa et al [15] -which is responsible for the hardness improvement.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It can be seen that density values from refs. [6] and [15] are quite superior than those from other works, just because these were measured by the water immersion methodArchimedes, thus neglecting the bulk porosity. The other works measured the densities by the conventional method hereby described, which consider the whole porosity.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Cobalt has long been the most valued matrix material used for professional tools, due to its excellent diamond retention characteristics and sinterability of commercial Co powders. As the price of cobalt is highly unstable and increasingly contributes to the overall tool cost, the recent industrial trend is toward replacement of cobalt-containing matrices with other, preferably iron alloys produced by PM (Ref [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10], by various routes (Ref 11,12). In our previous publications, we have identified and reported on such a promising alloy Fe-12% Mn-6.4% Cu-1.6% Sn-0.6% C (Ref [6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%