“…The morphology of the composites studied in this work, especially of PLANY1.5, was somewhat different from the one previously observed in the case of PCL/N6 composites, where larger-diameter fibers showed a poor interfacial adhesion, and bundles protruded from craters in the matrix. 47 Interestingly, in the composites studied in this work, all the fibers displayed the same optimal adhesion, irrespective of their diameter. On the contrary, in the case of PCL/N6 composites the finest filaments were firmly embedded in the matrix, their exposed end protruding directly from within the matrix, without the presence of craters at their base due to debonding, which was the case in the largest-diameter fibers.…”