2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.optmat.2021.111910
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, morphology, and photoresponse characteristics dependence on substrate nature of grown π-SnS films using chemical bath deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figures 2(b)-(d) exhibit noticeable morphological variations correlating with increasing Cu contents. In figure 2(b), the FESEM image reveals the evolution of new morphology like randomly oriented nanoplates with the incorporation of Cu [38]. The diameter of these nanoplates lies in the range of 300-450 nm with an average diameter of 50 nm.…”
Section: Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figures 2(b)-(d) exhibit noticeable morphological variations correlating with increasing Cu contents. In figure 2(b), the FESEM image reveals the evolution of new morphology like randomly oriented nanoplates with the incorporation of Cu [38]. The diameter of these nanoplates lies in the range of 300-450 nm with an average diameter of 50 nm.…”
Section: Morphological Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Figure 2 shows FESEM images of deposited films on various substrates. It is obvious that the grown films on polyester and glass substrates comprise many flower-like nanostructures agglomerating for SnS orthorhombic structure, as well as beneath a layer of spherical grains for cubic SnS [16,20,21]. While the grown film on the glass substrate comprised distributed and uniformly many flower-like nanostructures for orthorhombic structure SnS, as well as a beneath layer of spherical grains for cubic SnS, The presence of two morphologies that relate to orthorhombic and cubic structures agrees with the XRD analysis of Figure 1.…”
Section: Surface Morphologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The thin film with a thickness of 700 nm has reduced photocurrent, possibly because of the trapping of photo generated carriers in thicker film. In addition, the relation between the power density and the photocurrent may be fitted by a simple power-law [47,48]:…”
Section: Photodetector Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%