2017
DOI: 10.1017/jpa.2017.114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, not Bias

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The quantification of overlapping chronostratigraphical units and their contemporary arrangement in spatial bins (e.g. latitudinal bins; Figs 2–3) is also helpful in investigating the spatial architecture behind the distribution of these formations, and the fossil record they subsequently provide (Holland 2017). For example, the rhythmic fluctuations in the extent of epeiric seas and the tectonic rearrangements in latitudinal belts of depositional environments can be contemporarily quantified and correlated with spatiotemporal variations in diversity, providing a new, refined tool to investigate the common cause hypothesis (Butler et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantification of overlapping chronostratigraphical units and their contemporary arrangement in spatial bins (e.g. latitudinal bins; Figs 2–3) is also helpful in investigating the spatial architecture behind the distribution of these formations, and the fossil record they subsequently provide (Holland 2017). For example, the rhythmic fluctuations in the extent of epeiric seas and the tectonic rearrangements in latitudinal belts of depositional environments can be contemporarily quantified and correlated with spatiotemporal variations in diversity, providing a new, refined tool to investigate the common cause hypothesis (Butler et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas the primary aim of this chapter was to quantify the impact of the Pull of the Recent, it also focuses on the raw data, which serves as an important primer, regardless of the analytical methods used to quantify biodiversity, to understand the structure of the fossil record. Rather than focusing and emphasizing bias, it is this structure that should be utilized to guide and frame our analyses (Holland 2017). The results discussed within this chapter, further corroborate the quality of the New Zealand shallow-marine fossil record (Cooper et al 2006, Crampton et al 2006a, Crampton et al 2006b, Foote et al 2007, Clowes et al 2020 and sets the scene for the subsequent chapters which focus on other structural attributes of the New Zealand fossil record (Chapter 6) and their interpretation (Chapters 7 and 8).…”
Section: Prefacesupporting
confidence: 60%
“…The Pull of the Recent revisitednegligible species-level effect in a regional marine fossil record "It is time for us to move on from bias and focus and structure." Holland, 2017)…”
Section: Chaptermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A matter of continuing debate is whether the correlation between biodiversity and preserved rock quantity is evidence for preservation bias that has distorted patterns in the fossil record or is instead a signal of geological processes exerting direct or indirect controls on the timing of biological evolution and physical environmental changes that affect the pattern of sedimentation (Newell, 1959). The latter is known as the "common-cause" hypothesis (Crampton et al, 2003;Peters, 2005;Peters and Heim, 2011a;Peters et al, 2013;Holland, 2017;Husson and Peters, 2018;Nawrot et al, 2018). The appearances and disappearances of Ediacaran-type macrofossils are subject to this same debate (Seilacher, 1984;Amthor et al, 2003;Johnston et al, 2012;Laflamme et al, 2013;Cohen and Macdonald, 2015;Darroch et al, 2015;Sperling et al, 2016;Bowyer et al, 2017;Darroch et al, 2018;Tarhan et al, 2018;Gehling et al, 2019), particularly…”
Section: The Shuram-wonoka Anomaly and Marine Transgressionmentioning
confidence: 99%