2022
DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04392-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a B12-dependent radical SAM enzyme in carbapenem biosynthesis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
62
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
3
62
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the S N 2 and S N 2‐like methylation reaction catalysed by MTs three catalytic mechanisms have been described. In addition a radical‐based SAM mechanism exists [9a,b,44] as indicated above (see section 2): a recent review covers this topic and it will therefore not be discussed here [9b,33b–e] …”
Section: Catalytic Mechanisms Of Sam‐dependent Mtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the S N 2 and S N 2‐like methylation reaction catalysed by MTs three catalytic mechanisms have been described. In addition a radical‐based SAM mechanism exists [9a,b,44] as indicated above (see section 2): a recent review covers this topic and it will therefore not be discussed here [9b,33b–e] …”
Section: Catalytic Mechanisms Of Sam‐dependent Mtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These enzymes share 79% sequence identity and a common substrate, (2R,3R,5R)-pantetheinylated carbapenam (PCPM, 1). However, TokK and ThnK differ in the number of methylations they catalyze in the biosyntheses of asparenomycin (6) and thienamycin (5), respectively (Scheme 1). [1][2][3][4] The differences in the kinetic behavior of these two enzymes have been previously discussed, 1 and the recent structural characterization of TokK greatly improved our mechanistic understanding of Cbl-dependent rSAM methyl transfer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] The differences in the kinetic behavior of these two enzymes have been previously discussed, 1 and the recent structural characterization of TokK greatly improved our mechanistic understanding of Cbl-dependent rSAM methyl transfer. 5 Despite these advances, however, the stereochemical course of methylation by TokK could not be determined directly from the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consecutive methyl transfer processes have been observed for several class B RSMs such as PoyC, [ 54 ] CysS, [ 55‐56 ] and ThnK. [ 57‐59 ] In the reaction of the latter two enzymes, a second (or even third) methyl group can be installed on the nascent methyl group resulting from the first methyl transfer process. Because TsrM does not produce dAdo radical and appears unable to methylate a sp 3 carbon, we reasoned that 1 is not 2‐ethyltryptophan (2‐EtTrp) as a result of methyl transfer to the newly installed 2‐methyl group.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%