1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80790-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a Heterophilic Adhesion Complex between the Human CD2 and CD58 (LFA-3) Counterreceptors

Abstract: Interaction between CD2 and its counterreceptor, CD58 (LFA-3), on opposing cells optimizes immune recognition, facilitating contacts between helper T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells as well as between cytolytic effectors and target cells. Here, we report the crystal structure of the heterophilic adhesion complex between the amino-terminal domains of human CD2 and CD58. A strikingly asymmetric, orthogonal, face-to-face interaction involving the major beta sheets of the respective immunoglobulin-like do… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
241
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 222 publications
(245 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
4
241
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This association mode shows overall similarities to that observed in the CD2-CD58 heterophilic complex [33], but it differs in the detailed architecture and physicochemical properties of the interface. Most of the contacting residues in the 2B4-CD48 heterophilic interface are located in loops, whereas the NTB-A homophilic interface is composed mainly of strand-tostrand contacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…This association mode shows overall similarities to that observed in the CD2-CD58 heterophilic complex [33], but it differs in the detailed architecture and physicochemical properties of the interface. Most of the contacting residues in the 2B4-CD48 heterophilic interface are located in loops, whereas the NTB-A homophilic interface is composed mainly of strand-tostrand contacts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…It also resembles these interactions in that both receptor and ligand are relatively closely related to each other, are located on a small region of the chromosome and are likely to have arisen by gene duplication and evolved from a homophilic interaction [3]. At the molecular level, the finding that CD200 and CD200R interact through the GFCC' faces of their N-terminal domains is similar to the CD2/CD58 interaction [22] and the junctional adhesion molecule-1 (JAM1) homotypic interaction [23]. This face seems to be particularly suited to interactions between cell surface proteins.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Preliminary NMR relaxation analysis of the FGloop suggested significant internal dynamics on the subnanosecond time scale (data not shown), consistent with a highly disordered main chain. Interestingly, this long and unstructured FG-loop contains residues that are believed to play a role in ligand binding based on the closely related crystal structure of the CD2-CD58 complex (36). Strands C and C' form a hairpin β-structure connected by a well-defined CC'-loop (residues 37-42) that might also play a role in ligand binding (32,36).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, this long and unstructured FG-loop contains residues that are believed to play a role in ligand binding based on the closely related crystal structure of the CD2-CD58 complex (36). Strands C and C' form a hairpin β-structure connected by a well-defined CC'-loop (residues 37-42) that might also play a role in ligand binding (32,36). Strand C' is interrupted by a β-bulge at Glu45 and Ile46, forming two shorter strands, C 1 ' and C 2 ' (Figure 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation