1956
DOI: 10.1021/ja01598a087
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STRUCTURE OF CARBENE, CH2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
86
0
2

Year Published

1968
1968
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 220 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
2
86
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In the addition of singlet methylene t o 2-butene, the olefin 2-methyl-1-butene is seen only at low pressures where the isomerization of the initially formed cyclopropanes is not completely quenched. However, the trimethylene intermediate produced (7) and is in accord with the predictions of Hoffmann (3), the experimental observations of Crawford and Ali (6), and the idea of Skell and Woodworth put forward in 1956 (16).…”
Section: " ' Not Observedsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…In the addition of singlet methylene t o 2-butene, the olefin 2-methyl-1-butene is seen only at low pressures where the isomerization of the initially formed cyclopropanes is not completely quenched. However, the trimethylene intermediate produced (7) and is in accord with the predictions of Hoffmann (3), the experimental observations of Crawford and Ali (6), and the idea of Skell and Woodworth put forward in 1956 (16).…”
Section: " ' Not Observedsupporting
confidence: 77%
“…Studies on the P450cam-catalyzed epoxidation of trans-1-phenyl-2-vinylcyclopropane, a very sensitive radical clock probe, provided no evidence for the involvement of radicals or cations in the reaction (46). Collectively, the stereochemical and radical clock results may be interpreted to reflect an oxygen insertion by an oxenoid-heme species (reaction B), reminiscent of the insertion of carbenes into olefinic bonds (47,48). Alternatively, the radical clock studies, in conjunction with the stereochemical and mutagenesis findings presented in the present paper, could be explained by a mechanism (reaction C) in which the hydroperoxo-heme complex is the oxidant, resulting in epoxidation of the olefin by a concerted mechanism, similar to peracid epoxidation of olefins.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The addition of singlet carbenes to alkenes is well known to proceed in a single step [31][32][33] and in a non-least-motion fashion, [4,[34][35][36] as the least-motion mechanism is symmetry-forbidden in the sense of the WoodwardHoffmann rules. [37] The reaction is generally considered to proceed in two phases: in the first the carbene approaches suprafacially to the p system and thereby maximizes the electrophilic carbene-alkene interaction, that is, the HOMOA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (olefin)-LUMOA C H T U N G T R E N N U N G (carbene) interaction in terms of frontier orbital theory.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%