2015
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1504.07095
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of conformal metrics on $\mathbb{R}^n$ with constant $Q$-curvature

Abstract: In this article we study the nonlocal equationwhich arises in the conformal geometry. Inspired by the previous work of C. S. Lin and L. Martinazzi in even dimension and T. Jin, A. Maalaoui, L. Martinazzi, J. Xiong in dimension three we classify all solutions to the above equation in terms of their behavior at infinity.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
15
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof will be given at the end of Section 2. Similar higher-dimensional, also in the fractional case have appeared in [6,11,12,15,18,27].…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…The proof will be given at the end of Section 2. Similar higher-dimensional, also in the fractional case have appeared in [6,11,12,15,18,27].…”
supporting
confidence: 64%
“…(see Theorems 1 and 2 in [18]). This is consistent with a result of F. Robert [23], extended in [20], stating that in a region Ω 0 such that ∆u k L 1 (Ω 0 ) ≤ C, u k has a bubbling behaviour leading to solutions of the form (12). It was open whether there exists a sequence (u k ) of solutions to ( 2)-( 3) on some domain…”
Section: Gluing Open Problemssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…to one of the solutions provided by Theorems 1 and 2? Moreover, as shown by Chang-Chen [6], when m ≥ 2 problem (13) has several solutions which are not of the form (12). Such solutions behave polynomially at infinity, as shown in [17,18] (see also [12,16] for similar results in odd dimension).…”
Section: Gluing Open Problemsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Such an estimate is proven for example in [GO,Lemma 1], even though the dependence of the constant on the seminorms in S, is not explicitly written there (but it can be easily derived from the proof.) See also [Hy2,Lemma 2.2]. With the aid of ( 13) one can extend the definition of (−∆) α 2 u as a tempered distribution for any u ∈ L p , 1 ≤ p < ∞.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%