Summary: Propene‐ethene copolymers with low to moderate amounts of ethene were synthesised with two Cs‐symmetric metallocene complexes, [(p‐CH3OPh)2C(2,7‐di‐tBuFlu)(Cp)]ZrCl2 (I) and [(p‐CH3OPh)2C(2,7‐di‐tBuFlu)(Cp)]HfCl2 (Ia). Methylalumoxane (MAO), N,N‐dimethylanilinium tetra(pentafluorophenyl)borate {[Me2HNPh][B(C6F5)4]}, trityl tetra(pentafluorophenyl)borate {[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4]} and tris(pentafluorophenyl)borane [B(C6F5)3] were used as cocatalysts in the polymerisations. The differences in polymerisation activity, ethene incorporation rate and molecular weight as well as the microstructure and the thermal behaviour of the homo‐ and copolymers were studied.The different cocatalysts have a strong influence on the polymerisation activity and the syndiotacticity of the polymers, but only a minor influence on the ethene incorporation rate and the molecular weight. At 30 °C, the incorporation rate of ethene is ca. 25 times faster for complex I and ca. 16 times faster for complex Ia than the incorporation rate of propene. The thermal behaviour of the homo‐ and copolymers is dependent of the polymerisation temperature and the cocatalyst. I/MAO produces homo‐ and copolymers at 30 °C with more regular microstructure than I/[Me2HNPh][B(C6F5)4], I/[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] and I/B(C6F5)3 leading to homo‐ and copolymers with higher melting and crystallisation temperatures. On the contrary, at 0 °C I/[Me2HNPh][B(C6F5)4] and I/[Ph3C][B(C6F5)4] produce copolymers with higher propene sequence syndiotacticity and higher melting and crystallisation temperatures than I/MAO. The influence of the cocatalyst on the catalyst coordination environment is temperature‐dependent and thereby the structure of the forming homo‐ or copolymers varies.Effect of different cocatalysts and the amount of ethene in the feed on the polymerisation activity of complex I.magnified imageEffect of different cocatalysts and the amount of ethene in the feed on the polymerisation activity of complex I.