2004
DOI: 10.2116/analscix.20.x173
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of Gefitinib

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence of the protonation at atom N3 of the pyrimidine ring in (II), the intra-ring angle at N3 is about 6.2 larger than in (I), while the intra-ring angles at C20 and C21 decrease by about 4.9 and 4.6 , respectively. A similar trend is seen in the crystal structures of erlotinib and its salts Selvanayagam et al, 2008) and ErbB2 inhibitor and its salts (Li et al, 2006), and is also comparable with the trend in geftinib (Tanaka et al, 2004).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As a consequence of the protonation at atom N3 of the pyrimidine ring in (II), the intra-ring angle at N3 is about 6.2 larger than in (I), while the intra-ring angles at C20 and C21 decrease by about 4.9 and 4.6 , respectively. A similar trend is seen in the crystal structures of erlotinib and its salts Selvanayagam et al, 2008) and ErbB2 inhibitor and its salts (Li et al, 2006), and is also comparable with the trend in geftinib (Tanaka et al, 2004).…”
Section: Figuresupporting
confidence: 79%
“…This results in a widening of the three interior bond angles (C11-N1-C14, N2-C14-N1 and N1-C11-C12) of the above-described ring by about 6 and a narrowing of the exterior angle (C10-C11-N1) by 4 , when compared with the corresponding values in (II) ( Table 2). These features are also observed and found to be similar in geftinib (Tanaka et al, 2004) and erlotinib salt structures (Selvanayagam et al, 2008;Sridhar et al, 2010) (see Scheme).…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 58%
“…It matches form I (CCDC No. 259805) 17 of the drug as confirmed by the simulated PXRD pattern. Isonicotinamide was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich, India, as anhydrous crystalline powders with >99% purity, whereas vanillin was purchased from HiMedia, India.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…tacts. 24,17 Single-crystal X-ray diffraction of GEF-VAN revealed that the drug and coformer cocrystallized in a 2:1 stoichiometric ratio in the triclinic space group P1 (Figure S4a The quinazoline rings of the dimer are in proximity but are antioriented due to morpholine rings of each GEF molecule lying at opposite ends. This orientation of the GEF molecules allowed the accommodation of the coformer through the above-mentioned hydrogen bonding.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When we analyzed the EDX data of drug-loaded nanoparticles, the ratio of Ca/C/O was not ~1:1:3, and the elemental percentage of calcium was less than that of the CSCaCO 3 NP which suggests the presence of other elements which could be due to the surface functionalization with the drugs. It is interesting to note that when GEF with the molecular formula of C 22 H 24 ClNFN 4 O 3 [ 87 ] was analyzed, oxygen (10.85%), carbon (68.33%), nitrogen (14.02%), fluorine (4.05%), and chlorine (2.28%) were obtained. For PTXL, with the molecular formula C 47 H 51 NO 14 [ 88 ], only oxygen (16.37%) and carbon (80.63%) were inferred from the spectra, where the N peak could not be observed, even after repeated measurements at different sites.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%