1983
DOI: 10.1021/j100224a033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of ionic micelles from small angle neutron scattering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

21
76
0
2

Year Published

1986
1986
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(99 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
21
76
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The increase in SDS micelle size and aggregation number, and change in micelle shape upon surfactant addition that is observed here are consistent with what has been reported in the literature [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]47,50,51]. Similarly, stronger interactions, higher total micelle charge, and reduction in isothermal compressibility with increasing surfactant concentration have also been reported in the literature [52].…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The increase in SDS micelle size and aggregation number, and change in micelle shape upon surfactant addition that is observed here are consistent with what has been reported in the literature [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]47,50,51]. Similarly, stronger interactions, higher total micelle charge, and reduction in isothermal compressibility with increasing surfactant concentration have also been reported in the literature [52].…”
Section: Tablesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…SANS has been utilized to characterize SDS micelles in aqueous solutions, in the absence or presence of salt with different counterions [37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44]. However, SANS investigations of SDS in the presence of CDs have not been previously reported.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Please note that SDS micelle has been selected as a model system because it is the most intensively-characterized micelle through experimental analysis [17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33] and simulation methods [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45]. In experimental approaches, various techniques such as light scattering [18][19][20][21], fluorescence [24,25], SAXS [17,31] and SANS [23,26,27] have been used to characterize the size, shape, aggregation and charge of the SDS micelle at various conditions for concentration and temperature. Here it is noted that, despite great development in such experimental analysis, it is still challenging to attain molecular-level information of the internal structure of the SDS micelle experimentally.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAXS profile of a protein dispersed in aqueous solution with no interaction (or interference) can be described by IðQÞ ¼ I 0P PðQÞ, whereP PðQÞ is the normalized form factor, withP Pð0Þ ¼ 1 (Bendedouch et al, 1983;Chen, 1986), and the modulus of scattering vector Q ¼ ð4=Þ sin , where the scattering angle is 2 and the wavelength is . The zero scattering intensity I 0 ¼ CNðf À s V dry Þ 2 is determined by the concentration C, aggregation number N (for non-aggregated proteins N = 1), dry volume of protein V dry , scattering length f of the protein, and the scattering-length density s of the solvent (Chen & Lin, 1987;Wu & Chen, 1988;Feigin & Svergun, 1987).…”
Section: Saxs Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%