2020
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2005.05782
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of projective varieties with nef anticanonical divisor: the case of log terminal singularities

Abstract: In this article we study the structure of klt projective varieties with nef anticanonical divisor, especially the canonical fibrations associated to them. We show that • The Albanese map for such variety is a locally constant fibration (that is, an analytic fibre bundle with connected fibres which splits into a product when passing to the universal cover of the Albanese torus).• If the smooth locus is simply connected, the MRC fibration of such variety is an everywhere defined morphism and induces a decomposit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The most important remaining problem is to establish the structure theorem for klt pairs (X, ∆) with nef anti-canonical divisor −(K X + ∆). Wang in [Wan20] partially solved this problem when the regular locus X reg of X is simply connected and reduced the problem in the general case to some conjectures on fundamental groups of X reg . In the case X being smooth, this problem was solved by [CCM21] in the following form: Theorem 5.1 ([CCM21, Theorem 1.3]).…”
Section: Nef Anti-canonical Divisormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most important remaining problem is to establish the structure theorem for klt pairs (X, ∆) with nef anti-canonical divisor −(K X + ∆). Wang in [Wan20] partially solved this problem when the regular locus X reg of X is simply connected and reduced the problem in the general case to some conjectures on fundamental groups of X reg . In the case X being smooth, this problem was solved by [CCM21] in the following form: Theorem 5.1 ([CCM21, Theorem 1.3]).…”
Section: Nef Anti-canonical Divisormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From our viewpoints, it is not satisfactory that the conditions of Theorem 1.6 seem quite restrictive. We believe that, one can consider Question 1.2 itself (avoiding Question 1.4) by analyzing the universal covering of X; see the recent series papers [Cao19], [CH19], [CCM19] and [Wan20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%