1967
DOI: 10.1103/physrev.156.150
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of Resonances in Electron Scattering by Hydrogen Atoms

Abstract: A study of the structure of resonances just below the n = 2 excitation threshold in electron scattering by hydrogen atoms is carried out by utilizing an approximate method adopted from the projection-operator formalism. Analytic expressions for the level width near the threshold are obtained for both the singlet-and triplet-compound-state series with zero total angular momentum. It is found that the level widths behave like the level spacings in that they decrease exponentially as the levels approach the thres… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

1968
1968
1998
1998

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These resonances have also been confirmed in various experiments (Sanche and Burrow 1972, Williams 1976, Warner et al 1986. A couple of other resonances, including the triplet S-wave 3 S e and the singlet P-wave 1 P o , have also been found below this threshold by various authors (see, for example, Seiler et al 1971, Chen 1967, Sadeghpour 1992 and other references therein). However, no triplet D-wave resonance ( 3 D e ) has been seen in any list of the resonances observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…These resonances have also been confirmed in various experiments (Sanche and Burrow 1972, Williams 1976, Warner et al 1986. A couple of other resonances, including the triplet S-wave 3 S e and the singlet P-wave 1 P o , have also been found below this threshold by various authors (see, for example, Seiler et al 1971, Chen 1967, Sadeghpour 1992 and other references therein). However, no triplet D-wave resonance ( 3 D e ) has been seen in any list of the resonances observed.…”
supporting
confidence: 57%
“…where Fj w (#>^) ar e the normalized spherical harmonics, and r 0 is the effective range of the atomic potential" On the sphere S 2 (R»r) the radial part of the function ^(fj can be represented in the form B 1 (r 1 )=/e 1 U + AR)=/2 1 (/2) e 0rCOsa , (14) where /3 = y + (A^) _1 ln[l + (AR/R)], Ai?=-rcos6>, and for R»\AR\,…”
Section: -(^)V^mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(13), (14), and (17), we have ( \ m i r or i\ h \f~lV 2 im \W , ( + v (-) l \ 2L+1) (1, + mJl e ^ * l(r i } = 72^T)TT L 2~~ (Z^mJlJ "(2^ be multiplied by a factor P $ which is just the square of the corresponding Clebsch-Gordan coefficient. When one electron is captured and the atomic core has spin zero, the spin factor P s is R^R) sin l Br l e^ /R l .…”
Section: -(^)V^mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(14) in I), but they depend on the en ergy of the lowest lying bound state in the cor responding dipole potential Vy (see e.g. Chen [12]), which in our case is not known. Besides, since for small 12 values the internal region is important, and there Vy deviate considerably from their asymptotic form, we calculate the corresponding § matrix ele ments by a matching procedure, without making use of (14) from I.…”
Section: The Interaction Potentialmentioning
confidence: 72%