2007
DOI: 10.1029/2006jb004611
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the California Coast Ranges and San Andreas Fault at SAFOD from seismic waveform inversion and reflection imaging

Abstract: A seismic reflection and refraction survey across the San Andreas Fault (SAF) near Parkfield provides a detailed characterization of crustal structure across the location of the San Andreas Fault Observatory at Depth (SAFOD). Steep‐dip prestack migration and frequency domain acoustic waveform tomography were applied to obtain highly resolved images of the upper 5 km of the crust for 15 km on either side of the SAF. The resulting velocity model constrains the top of the Salinian granite with great detail. Steep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
104
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
6
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Direct reflection imaging of steep faults is rare, with only a few examples in California (e.g., Shaw and Shearer, 1999;Hole et al, 2001;Bleibinhaus et al, 2007). The imaging method of Bauer et al (2013) represents a promising tool that can be applied to steep faults worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct reflection imaging of steep faults is rare, with only a few examples in California (e.g., Shaw and Shearer, 1999;Hole et al, 2001;Bleibinhaus et al, 2007). The imaging method of Bauer et al (2013) represents a promising tool that can be applied to steep faults worldwide.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 A schematic plot of a typical fault zone, after Chester and Logan (1986) Pinto Mountain faults, Southern California (Fialko et al 2002). In addition, many geophysical methods have been applied in deriving FZ properties such as gravity and electromagnetic surveys, seismic reflection and refraction, travel-time tomography, earthquake location, waveform modeling of FZ-reflected body waves, FZ head waves, and FZ trapped waves (e.g., Mooney and Ginzburg 1986;BenZion and Malin 1991;Ben-Zion et al 1992;Hole et al 2001;Prejean et al 2002;Waldhauser and Ellsworth 2002;Li et al 2002;McGuire and Ben-Zion 2005;Bleibinhaus et al 2007;Li et al 2007;Yang et al 2009;Roland et al 2012). In the following, I briefly review a few seismological and geodetic methods that have been used to derive FZ structure.…”
Section: Fz Properties and Their Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For practical applications, severe simplifications must be employed to make the inversion feasible. In controlled-source seismology, the most popular forward solutions are 2D, isotropic, acoustic or viscoacoustic, and FD frequencydomain methods ͑e.g., Hicks and Pratt, 2001;Operto et al, 2004;Ravaut et al, 2004;Operto et al, 2006;Bleibinhaus et al, 2007;Gao et al, 2007;Malinowski and Operto, 2008͒. Validity of this approximation has been established by a study on a physical scale model by Pratt ͑1999͒.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%