Crustal Studies Technical Letter 1963
DOI: 10.3133/70039282
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the crust and upper mantle in the western United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1964
1964
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crust along this profile is more nearly like that in the Basin and Range province than it is in other provinces covered by U.S. Geological Survey refraction profiles (Pakiser, 1963 Ab8tract.-The degree to which the water level in an open well responds to a seismic wave is determined by (1) the dimensions of the well, (2) the transmissibility, storage coefficient, and porosity of the aquifer, and (3) the period and amplitude of the wave. The amplitude of the vertical landsurface motion associated with Rayleigh waves may be computed, provided sufficient data regarding the above parameters are available.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The crust along this profile is more nearly like that in the Basin and Range province than it is in other provinces covered by U.S. Geological Survey refraction profiles (Pakiser, 1963 Ab8tract.-The degree to which the water level in an open well responds to a seismic wave is determined by (1) the dimensions of the well, (2) the transmissibility, storage coefficient, and porosity of the aquifer, and (3) the period and amplitude of the wave. The amplitude of the vertical landsurface motion associated with Rayleigh waves may be computed, provided sufficient data regarding the above parameters are available.…”
Section: Discussion Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…5). If isostatic balance is assumed (Pakiser, 1963;Mabey, 1960), the crust in the area of Little Fish Lake and Monitor Valleys is thicker than is normal for the Great Basin. Seismic data support the inference that the crust is thicker in this central zone (Eaton, 1963;Hill and Pakiser, 1966;Warren, 1968;and Prodehl, 1970).…”
Section: Structurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active observational programmes, natural earthquakes covering a wide range of epicentral distances and the nuclear explosions at the Nevada Test Site in the Basin and Range Province have combined to place the region among the seismologically best-observed on the planet. Refraction profiles have revealed regional variations of the Pn velocity in the upper mantle just under the M -discontinuity (HERRIN and TAGGART, 1962;PAKISER 1963) and in crustal thickness and composion (PAKISER and RoBINsoN, 1966). Pn velocities are lower in the western superprovince than under the Great Plains, and lowest under the Basin and Range; and a thin silicic crust is characteristic of the western region.…”
Section: Structure From Seismologymentioning
confidence: 99%