2017
DOI: 10.1039/c6ja00398b
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the Fe and Ni L X-ray spectra

Abstract: Diagram and satellite line parameters were obtained from Fe-L and Ni-L X-ray spectra induced by electron impact.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A pure bulk Sn standard was irradiated by a 16-keV electron beam in a JEOL JXA 8230 electron probe in which a Johansson-type wavelength dispersive spectrometer (WDS) is attached, the take-off angle being 40 • . The x-ray L spectrum emitted was acquired by means of a PET analyzing crystal with an already characterized efficiency curve ε(E ), in terms of the detected photon energy E [26], and registered with a P10 flow counter. This curve was originally determined [27] from the comparison of two experimental spectra acquired from one single sample at the same incidence energy, one of them recorded with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), and the second one with the WDS whose efficiency was surveyed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pure bulk Sn standard was irradiated by a 16-keV electron beam in a JEOL JXA 8230 electron probe in which a Johansson-type wavelength dispersive spectrometer (WDS) is attached, the take-off angle being 40 • . The x-ray L spectrum emitted was acquired by means of a PET analyzing crystal with an already characterized efficiency curve ε(E ), in terms of the detected photon energy E [26], and registered with a P10 flow counter. This curve was originally determined [27] from the comparison of two experimental spectra acquired from one single sample at the same incidence energy, one of them recorded with an energy dispersive spectrometer (EDS), and the second one with the WDS whose efficiency was surveyed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Atomic-level widths for atomic levels K to N 7 were compiled by Campbell & Papp (2001) from available experimental data but, unfortunately, they do not include data for the M 4,5 levels of Ni, Cu, Fe, and Zn, which are needed to calculate the La line widths. Experimental natural La line widths for metallic Fe, Ni, Cu, and Zn have been reported by Bonnelle (1966), Faessler (2013, Rémond et al (2002), andSepúlveda et al (2017), which are listed in Table 2. In this work, we have arbitrarily adopted the natural FWHMs reported by Bonnelle for Fe (3.7 eV) and Ni (2.58 eV) and by Faesler for Cu (3.7 eV), and Zn (1.7 eV).…”
Section: Self-absorption Of Diagram Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is formed either by an L 1 -L 3 M Coster-Kronig transition or by a shake-off process, in which an electron from the M-shell is ejected at the same time that the 2p 3/2 vacancy is formed. A satellite line is also visible at the low energy side of the La line, originated by the radiative Auger effect (RAE) (Sepúlveda et al, 2017). The effect of satellite lines can be included in equation ( 4) by letting L(E) be the sum of both diagram and satellite contributions, i.e.…”
Section: Effect Of Satellites and Instrumental Broadeningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding spectator hole satellite lines, the distortion of levels caused by the presence of an additional vacancy is more important for the outer shells than for the inner ones. For this reason, for a given diagram transition, the satellite lines associated are more intense for lower atomic numbers [2][3][4][5][6]. Analogously, for a given element, the satellite emission is expected to be more noticeable for lines involving more external shells.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%