2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03238.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the Grímsvötn central volcano under the Vatnajökull icecap, Iceland

Abstract: S U M M A R YThe subglacial Grímsvötn central volcano, lying within a volcanic zone directly above the core of the Iceland mantle plume, is one of the most active in Iceland. Local, regional and teleseismic earthquake data recorded on a temporary seismometer array across western Vatnajökull icecap during the summer of 1998 have provided a three-dimensional image of the shallow crustal structure of the volcano. Microearthquake activity at depths of 1-4 km along the Grímsvötn caldera rim coincided with inflation… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we do not interpret this as a depth of long-term storage for the following reasons: first, the volume of each eruption in the 10 ka Grímsvötn tephra series (>1-30 km 3 ; Thordarson 2014) is at least comparable with that of the currently active shallow melt lens (~10 km 3 ; Alfaro et al 2007). Assuming that Grímsvötn's subsurface architecture has not changed substantially over the past ~10 ka, this comparison indicates that recharge from depth must have been efficient and continuous in order to avoid magma exhaustion on both intra-and inter-eruption timescales.…”
Section: Magma Storage Depths and Barometric Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…However, we do not interpret this as a depth of long-term storage for the following reasons: first, the volume of each eruption in the 10 ka Grímsvötn tephra series (>1-30 km 3 ; Thordarson 2014) is at least comparable with that of the currently active shallow melt lens (~10 km 3 ; Alfaro et al 2007). Assuming that Grímsvötn's subsurface architecture has not changed substantially over the past ~10 ka, this comparison indicates that recharge from depth must have been efficient and continuous in order to avoid magma exhaustion on both intra-and inter-eruption timescales.…”
Section: Magma Storage Depths and Barometric Inconsistenciesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…All Rights Reserved. Also, based on tomographic inversion of micro-earthquake activity, Alfaro et al [2007] estimated that this reservoir is a sill that is located ∼3 km to 4 km in depth, with a maximum extent of 7 km to 8 km E-W and 4 km to 5 km N-S, and with a thickness of 1 km. From the recent inversion of the ground deformation data (using GPS and a tiltmeter), the top of the chamber is expected to be located at an even shallower depth, at ∼1.7 km [Hreinsdottir et al, 2014].…”
Section: Reverso Et Almentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 9 shows the results of the modeling. The geometry of the shallow reservoir is set as a sill, after Alfaro et al [2007]. Its depth was inferred at 1.7 km (±0.2 km) by inversion of the horizontal and vertical components of the GPS station together with the tiltmeter data using a Mogi model [Hreinsdottir et al, 2014].…”
Section: Estimation Of the Model Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These values are chosen such that they are consistent with the case of Grímsvötn volcano in Iceland. In particular, at Grímsvötn Volcano, the shallow storage zone has been well characterized by seismic and geodetic studies (Alfaro et al, 2007;Hreinsdóttir et al, 2014). Other geometrical parameters are chosen in consistent with the study of Reverso et al (2014).…”
Section: Generating Synthetic Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%