2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2012.02.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents: An ordinal factor analysis of clinician ratings of a sample of young people referred to community mental health services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
5
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
2
5
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The omega subscale coefficients (ω s ) obtained from the bifactor model can be considered useful indicators of a factor's unique strength, independent from the general factor, and can also help determine the plausibility of subscales. In the current study, the ω s values obtained in both the original sample and replication sample were relatively low to typical in range (Gignac and Kretzschmar, 2017 ), but do overlap with coefficients yielded by other psychological measures with strong validity (see Hull et al, 2010 ; Tiffin and Rolling, 2012 ; Dombrowski et al, 2015 ). Despite the dominance of a general factor and low to typical ω s values, we argue that from a theoretical and conceptual point of view, the modality subscales in the MUSEQ still serve a unique function, as indicated by theoretically meaningful group differences yielded on the subscales.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…The omega subscale coefficients (ω s ) obtained from the bifactor model can be considered useful indicators of a factor's unique strength, independent from the general factor, and can also help determine the plausibility of subscales. In the current study, the ω s values obtained in both the original sample and replication sample were relatively low to typical in range (Gignac and Kretzschmar, 2017 ), but do overlap with coefficients yielded by other psychological measures with strong validity (see Hull et al, 2010 ; Tiffin and Rolling, 2012 ; Dombrowski et al, 2015 ). Despite the dominance of a general factor and low to typical ω s values, we argue that from a theoretical and conceptual point of view, the modality subscales in the MUSEQ still serve a unique function, as indicated by theoretically meaningful group differences yielded on the subscales.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 43%
“…General psychological wellbeing was assessed using Section A of the Health of the Nation Outcome Scales for Children and Adolescents (HoNOSCA) [14], a 13-item self-report scale which addresses disruptive/aggressive behaviours, over-activity/ concentration problems, self-injury, substance misuse, academic skills, physical illness, hallucinations/delusions, nonorganic somatic symptoms, emotional symptoms, peer relationships, self-care, family relationships, and school attendance, with higher scores indicating poorer psychological wellbeing. Cronbach's alpha is reported at 0.56 [15] and in the current study was 0.89. The outcome variable used was the global score and this general wellbeing measure was included to explore the specificity of any potential findings regarding pastoral care and ED symptoms.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 45%
“…The HoNOSCA is a brief, clinician‐completed measure (Department of Health and Ageing, ) that has been found to be sensitive to change as a result of treatment interventions (Brann & Coleman, ; Garralda, Yates, & Higginson, ; Gowers et al., ; Tiffin & Rolling, ). The HoNOSCA measure was used in this study as it is routinely employed to gather child and adolescent mental health client clinical outcomes within LRH CAMHS.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%