2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.susc.2011.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the In-rich InAs (001) surface

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We did not detect a similar pattern in TEM ( Figure 2 ), which is a bulk probe, suggesting it is strictly a surface phenomenon. This pattern resembles the surface reconstruction reported for differently oriented surfaces in several III–V compounds in the presence of excessive ions, either cations 21 , 22 or anions. 23 Thus, as the MBE growth of our NWs is conducted under As overpressure, we assert that the reconstruction pattern observed in the STM relates to the excess As ions at the surface.…”
Section: Atomic-scale Superstructure In Tapered Nwssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…We did not detect a similar pattern in TEM ( Figure 2 ), which is a bulk probe, suggesting it is strictly a surface phenomenon. This pattern resembles the surface reconstruction reported for differently oriented surfaces in several III–V compounds in the presence of excessive ions, either cations 21 , 22 or anions. 23 Thus, as the MBE growth of our NWs is conducted under As overpressure, we assert that the reconstruction pattern observed in the STM relates to the excess As ions at the surface.…”
Section: Atomic-scale Superstructure In Tapered Nwssupporting
confidence: 86%
“…(d) based on a model for InAs and InSb 4 × 2 37,38. The respective model for the TMA dosed and annealed surface below 190 • C again induces a surface reconstruction to generate a row order of 90 • with 0.8 nm row spacing,Figure 4(e).…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The more the reconstructions included in the calculations, the more accurate the prediction of the fraction of each reconstruction. Therefore, all the previously suggested (4 × 2) reconstructions, such as β3′(4 × 2) 20 , ζ(4 × 2) 17 , 18 , and ζa(4 × 2) 19 , 21 , 22 , were examined. In addition, for the c(4 × 4) reconstructions, not only the homodimers consisting of the six surface As atoms but also the heterodimer configurations were considered, as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the plausible reasons for this is that certain unknown (4 × 2) reconstructions may be stable. In fact, several new InAs (001) (4 × 2) reconstructions were suggested, such as β3′(4 × 2) 20 , ζ(4 × 2) 17 , 18 , and ζa(4 × 2) 19 , 21 , 22 , whose feasibilities are still being debated on. Another limitation of the conventional DFT calculations is that they cannot predict the coexistence of multiple reconstructions, although the coexistence of some reconstructions on InAs (001) was experimentally identified, such as the mixture of c(4 × 4) with (2 × 4) 15 , that of β2(2 × 4) with α2(2 × 4) 11 13 , and that of (2 × 4) with (4 × 2) 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%