1989
DOI: 10.1130/0016-7606(1989)101<0683:sotkoi>2.3.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the Kingston orocline in the Appalachian fold-thrust belt, New York

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1991
1991
2007
2007

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These ramp thrusts reflect increased structural shortening above the Austin Glen-Martinsburg detachment southwest of Kingston and concomitantly greater structural relief and amplitude of folding in the Shawangunk (Friedman 1957b;Marshak and Tabor 1989). This line of evidence suggests that the forelanddipping Shawangunk monocline may be present over blind ramp thrusts that failed to reach the surface in the Martinsburg Formation and terminate as unexposed fiat thrusts in the Paleozoic sequence west of the frontal monocline.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Evidence For Time Of Deformation And MImentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These ramp thrusts reflect increased structural shortening above the Austin Glen-Martinsburg detachment southwest of Kingston and concomitantly greater structural relief and amplitude of folding in the Shawangunk (Friedman 1957b;Marshak and Tabor 1989). This line of evidence suggests that the forelanddipping Shawangunk monocline may be present over blind ramp thrusts that failed to reach the surface in the Martinsburg Formation and terminate as unexposed fiat thrusts in the Paleozoic sequence west of the frontal monocline.…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Evidence For Time Of Deformation And MImentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The later of the two phases is well represented in the Lackawanna Valley, Pennsylvania, and is termed the Lackawanna phase. On the basis of these secondary structures, as well as on structural and stratigraphic grounds, the major post-Taconian deformation in the Shawangunk region has been assigned to the (Permian) Lackawanna phase of the Alleghanian orogeny (Sanders 1969;Drake 1980;Geiser and Engelder 1983;Epstein and Lyttle 1987;and Marshak and Tabor 1989).…”
Section: Tectonic Setting and Evidence For Time Of Deformation And MImentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…3b), suggesting a possible relationship between them. As noted above, the 091° joint and lineament set most likely formed in response to the Acadian orogeny (410-360Ma 1 Sutter et al, 1985;Marshak and Tabor, 1989) or formation of the OttawaBonnechere-Nipissing rift system which initially occurred during the late Hadrynian but was reactivated during the early Cretaceous (Kumarapeli, 1985). On the basis of their postglacial age, occurrence as long en-echelon structures in open fields normal to S H m«, and association with pre-Cenozoic fractures, we suggest that the pop-up structures formed in order to relieve high near-surface tectonic stresses that were accumulated beneath the Laurentide Ice Sheet.…”
Section: Origin and Significance Of The Pop-up Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Marshak 1988, Marshak andFlöttmann 1996;Marshak and Tabor 1989), Paulsen and Marshak (1994). Syntaxes are cusp forms or curves concave to the foreland (Sengör in Myashiro et al 1988, Marshak 1988, Moores and Twiss 1995.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%