2021
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggab265
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the northwestern North Anatolian Fault Zone imaged via teleseismic scattering tomography

Abstract: Summary Information on fault zone structure is essential for our understanding of earthquake mechanics, continental deformation and seismic hazard. We use the scattered seismic wavefield to study the subsurface structure of the North-Anatolian Fault Zone (NAFZ) in the region of the 1999 İzmit and Düzce ruptures using data from an 18-month dense deployment of seismometers with a nominal station spacing of 7 km. Using the forward- and back-scattered energy that follows the direct P-wave arrival fr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
4
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further validation of our harmonic energy estimates comes from Rost et al. (2021) that suggested a more homogeneous crustal structure in the Armutlu Peninsula, which is confirmed by our low harmonic energy distribution resolved for upper crustal depths for this region. The NA inversion in this study, yielded well‐constrained models with anisotropic trend and strike of fast plane estimates consistent with geomorphological observations and existing knowledge of neo‐tectonic features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Further validation of our harmonic energy estimates comes from Rost et al. (2021) that suggested a more homogeneous crustal structure in the Armutlu Peninsula, which is confirmed by our low harmonic energy distribution resolved for upper crustal depths for this region. The NA inversion in this study, yielded well‐constrained models with anisotropic trend and strike of fast plane estimates consistent with geomorphological observations and existing knowledge of neo‐tectonic features.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…The reflectivity is disrupted around 40.75°N suggesting the presence of a step in the Moho below the Northern strand. The latter observation is in agreement with previous studies (Jenkins et al., 2020; Rost et al., 2021). Below the Moho, reflective structures are observed, mainly beneath AA and IZ, in agreement with Kahraman et al.…”
Section: D Structure Of the Nafzsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…At the east of the Sea of Marmara, the Moho depth was reported to be between 30 and 35 km (Vanacore et al, 2013;Zor et al, 2003). A deepening of the Moho was identified (∼40 km) in the IZ by The latter observation is in agreement with previous studies (Jenkins et al, 2020;Rost et al, 2021). Below the Moho, reflective structures are observed, mainly beneath AA and IZ, in agreement with Kahraman et al (2015).…”
Section: D Structure Of the Nafzsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2013) receiver function analysis and Rost et al. (2021) teleseismic scattering tomography; the lithosphere‐asthenosphere boundary (LAB) depth of 80 km is from Aldanmaz et al. (2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%