2017
DOI: 10.1007/s10509-017-3151-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the solar photosphere studied from the radiation hydrodynamics code ANTARES

Abstract: The ANTARES radiation hydrodynamics code is capable of simulating the solar granulation in detail unequaled by direct observation. We introduce a state-of-the-art numerical tool to the solar physics community and demonstrate its applicability to model the solar granulation. The code is based on the weighted essentially non-oscillatory finite volume method and by its implementation of local mesh refinement is also capable of simulating turbulent fluids. While the ANTARES code already provides promising insights… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the pioneering simulations of Nordlund (1982), a plethora of codes that aim to model solar and/or stellar atmospheres in 3D have been developed. The ones that I am aware of are: Stagger (e.g., Stein and Nordlund 1998, but many different versions of this code exist), MURaM (Vögler 2004;Rempel 2017), Bifrost (Gudiksen et al 2011), COBOLD (Freytag et al 2012), Stellarbox (Wray et al 2015), RAMENS (Iijima and Yokoyama 2015;Iijima 2016), MANCHA3D (Khomenko et al 2017(Khomenko et al , 2018, ANTARES (Leitner et al 2017), and RADMHD (Abbett and Fisher 2012). The latter is the only code that does not use the radiation treatment developed by Nordlund (1982), and instead uses a simpler but much faster method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the pioneering simulations of Nordlund (1982), a plethora of codes that aim to model solar and/or stellar atmospheres in 3D have been developed. The ones that I am aware of are: Stagger (e.g., Stein and Nordlund 1998, but many different versions of this code exist), MURaM (Vögler 2004;Rempel 2017), Bifrost (Gudiksen et al 2011), COBOLD (Freytag et al 2012), Stellarbox (Wray et al 2015), RAMENS (Iijima and Yokoyama 2015;Iijima 2016), MANCHA3D (Khomenko et al 2017(Khomenko et al , 2018, ANTARES (Leitner et al 2017), and RADMHD (Abbett and Fisher 2012). The latter is the only code that does not use the radiation treatment developed by Nordlund (1982), and instead uses a simpler but much faster method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3D atmospheres account for the time-dependence and multidimensionality of the flow, and a spectral synthesis using these atmospheres reproduces line shapes and asymmetries. Prominent examples include STAGGER (Magic et al 2013), MuRAM (Vögler et al 2005), Bifrost (Gudiksen et al 2011), and Antares (Leitner et al 2017). In this work, we use CO 5 BOLD , a conservative hydrodynamics solver able to model surface convection, waves, shocks and other phenomena in stellar objects (Freytag et al 2012).…”
Section: Model Atmospheresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High-precision determinations of stellar properties require a detailed modeling of stellar surfaces and an understanding of how the emerging spectrum of radiation is formed. The structure of convective motions can be modeled in some detail with 3D and time-dependent hydrodynamics; such model photospheres are now established as the most realistic descriptions of stellar outer layers, at least in solar-type stars (Beeck et al 2013a;Freytag et al 2012;Kupka & Muthsam 2017;Leenaarts 2020;Leitner et al 2017;Magic et al 2013;Nordlund et al 2009;Trampedach et al 2013;Tremblay et al 2013), with a general agreement among different model families (Beeck et al 2012;Pereira et al 2013).…”
Section: Spectra From 3d Hydrodynamic Atmospheresmentioning
confidence: 99%