1999
DOI: 10.1016/s1464-1895(99)00096-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the West Carpathian accretionary wedge: Insights from cross section construction and sandbox validation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, the mechanisms by which crustal shortening and thickening are achieved, as well as the magnitudes, are known to vary along strike (e.g., Allmendinger and Gubbels, 1996;Giambiagi et al, 2012;Ramos et al, 2004). Factors that significantly affect the structural style and magnitude of deformation include the inherited structural and stratigraphic architecture of a region (e.g., Lowell, 1995;Boyer, 1995;DeCelles and Mitra, 1995;Macedo and Marshak, 1999;Kley et al, 1999;Nemcok et al, 1999;Mouthereau et al, 2002;Marshak, 2004;Thomas, 2007) and the degree of coupling between brittle deformation in the upper crust and ductile strain in the lower crust (e.g., Brown, 2004;Yin, 2006;Lamb, 2011;Giambiagi et al, 2014Giambiagi et al, , 2012. In this paper, we address two questions regarding the kinematic development of a retroarc fold-and-thrust belt: (1) How is the structure of the fold-and-thrust belt influenced by the antecedent stratigraphic architecture of a predecessor basin?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the mechanisms by which crustal shortening and thickening are achieved, as well as the magnitudes, are known to vary along strike (e.g., Allmendinger and Gubbels, 1996;Giambiagi et al, 2012;Ramos et al, 2004). Factors that significantly affect the structural style and magnitude of deformation include the inherited structural and stratigraphic architecture of a region (e.g., Lowell, 1995;Boyer, 1995;DeCelles and Mitra, 1995;Macedo and Marshak, 1999;Kley et al, 1999;Nemcok et al, 1999;Mouthereau et al, 2002;Marshak, 2004;Thomas, 2007) and the degree of coupling between brittle deformation in the upper crust and ductile strain in the lower crust (e.g., Brown, 2004;Yin, 2006;Lamb, 2011;Giambiagi et al, 2014Giambiagi et al, , 2012. In this paper, we address two questions regarding the kinematic development of a retroarc fold-and-thrust belt: (1) How is the structure of the fold-and-thrust belt influenced by the antecedent stratigraphic architecture of a predecessor basin?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…lb), except profile 1, which goes further to the Inner Carpathians. As profiles 1 and 2 have already been discussed in detail in Nem~ok et al (1999Nem~ok et al ( , 2000Nem~ok et al ( , 2001, this paper focuses on the description of the remaining profiles 3 to 5 (Fig. 3).…”
Section: Balancing Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…lb). Details for cross-section construction are partly described in Nem~ok et al (1999Nem~ok et al ( , 2000Nem~ok et al ( , 2001 and further information is given below. Data constraints for balancing were provided by:…”
Section: Balancingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(b) Scenario with subduction zone retreat manages to create space for crustal accretion without a need for retro-thrusting. (400-450 km) with that of the Carpathians (75-223 km; Platt et al 1989;Roca et al 1995;Schmid et al 1996;Nemčok et al 1999). The difference is also indicated by the fact that the entire upper crust of the more proximal parts of the European plate was accreted to the Alpine orogenic wedge, while involvement of the basement of the European plate in the West Carpathian accretionary wedge is minor (Roure et al 1993;Roca et al 1995;Schmid et al 1996;Nemčok et al 2000).…”
Section: Dynamic Setting Categories Of Thick-skin Provincesmentioning
confidence: 93%