1994
DOI: 10.1016/0009-2614(94)87073-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of the ZnO(0001) surface studied by X-ray photoelectron diffraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, small scale structures used for fitting this model agree with experimental results indicating that the O-terminated polar face closely resembles the bulk termination [16] and that no defects other than (1010) steps on the surface appear [17]. Growth has previously been studied on both polar (0001)-O terminated and (0001)-Zn terminated surfaces experimentally [18] as polar surfaces have been shown to be very stable [19].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…However, small scale structures used for fitting this model agree with experimental results indicating that the O-terminated polar face closely resembles the bulk termination [16] and that no defects other than (1010) steps on the surface appear [17]. Growth has previously been studied on both polar (0001)-O terminated and (0001)-Zn terminated surfaces experimentally [18] as polar surfaces have been shown to be very stable [19].…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The two faces are known to be structurally and chemically different. 1,2 They have been identified by x-ray diffraction, low energy electron diffraction, 3 photoelectron diffraction, 4 coaxial impact-collision ion scattering spectroscopy, 5 the sign of the piezoelectric coefficient, and etch rate measurements in HCl or H 2 NO. 6 In the current paper we compare photoluminescence ͑PL͒ measurements on the two polar faces of ZnO.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An XPD study 34 found a contraction of 25 % of d 12 , but like in the LEED analysis 28 , the wrong bulk structure of Ref. 29 was used in the scattering simulations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%