2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0376-7388(02)00305-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure–performance correlation of polyamide thin film composite membranes: effect of coating conditions on film formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
50
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 234 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1540 cm -1 decreases in intensity and undergoes a slight hypochromic shift with exposure. The peak at 1487 cm -1 corresponds to a characteristic peak (CH 2 stretch) of polysulfone [52] whereas the peak at 1540 cm -1 corresponds to the C-N stretch of the PA (II) group [18]. It appears that the polysulfone layer of this material is not affected by the chloramine solution as evidenced by the unchanged characteristic peak however a chemical change in the PA structure has occurred as a result of chloramine exposure.…”
Section: Structural Changes Measured By Infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…1540 cm -1 decreases in intensity and undergoes a slight hypochromic shift with exposure. The peak at 1487 cm -1 corresponds to a characteristic peak (CH 2 stretch) of polysulfone [52] whereas the peak at 1540 cm -1 corresponds to the C-N stretch of the PA (II) group [18]. It appears that the polysulfone layer of this material is not affected by the chloramine solution as evidenced by the unchanged characteristic peak however a chemical change in the PA structure has occurred as a result of chloramine exposure.…”
Section: Structural Changes Measured By Infrared Spectroscopymentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Freger [27] measured the membrane thickness of LPRO and SWRO membranes by transmission electron microscopy and reported that the LPRO membrane have thinner active skin layer than the SWRO membrane, which is consistent with the fact that it is an SWRO membrane with lower permeability and higher sodium ion rejection than the ESPA2 and ESPAB membranes (Table 3). In addition, Prakash et al [30] reported a strong correlation between the effective thickness of active skin layer and pure water permeability of RO membranes. It is also noteworthy that the ESPAB is likely to be a modified version of the ESPA2 (which may explain the same calculated free-volume hole-radii of these two membranes).…”
Section: Pals Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For having high permeability and selectivity, the barrier layer of TFC membrane should be very thin with a highly crosslinked structure [5][6][7]. Besides, the separation performance of TFC membrane is also known to be influenced by the intrinsic properties of the barrier layer, namely, surface charge, surface morphology, hydrophilicity, chemical functionality and pore size, since they affect the interaction between water and solutes [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides, the separation performance of TFC membrane is also known to be influenced by the intrinsic properties of the barrier layer, namely, surface charge, surface morphology, hydrophilicity, chemical functionality and pore size, since they affect the interaction between water and solutes [8][9][10][11]. In order to achieve the desired properties, numerous studies have already been made by different researchers to optimize the conditions of interfacial polymerization, such as the type of monomer and its concentration, reaction time and curing conditions [7,12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%