2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41578-019-0101-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure prediction drives materials discovery

Abstract: Progress in the discovery of new materials has been accelerated by the development of reliable quantum-mechanical approaches to crystal structure prediction. The properties of a material depend very sensitively on its structure, therefore structure prediction is the key to computational materials discovery. Structure prediction was considered to be a formidable problem, but the development of new computational tools has allowed the structures of many new and increasingly complex materials to be anticipated. Th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
392
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 554 publications
(400 citation statements)
references
References 239 publications
(292 reference statements)
5
392
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This way, the ML potential "steers" itself into regions of configuration space that need to be further explored, and large amounts of structures can be quickly assembled, much more quickly than would be possible with DFT-MD. [5] This idea can be taken a step further, by exploring and fitting structural space on the fly (and running all structural optimizations with interim potentials, requiring DFT only for single-point input data), thereby unifying ideas from ML potential fitting and crystal-structure searching. Similar strategies were later used for amorphous carbon, [43] where hundreds of small structural snapshots could be generated in parallel runs using a computationally cheap interim potential, and the end points of these trajectories were evaluated with DFT and added to the database.…”
Section: Ingredient 1: Reference Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This way, the ML potential "steers" itself into regions of configuration space that need to be further explored, and large amounts of structures can be quickly assembled, much more quickly than would be possible with DFT-MD. [5] This idea can be taken a step further, by exploring and fitting structural space on the fly (and running all structural optimizations with interim potentials, requiring DFT only for single-point input data), thereby unifying ideas from ML potential fitting and crystal-structure searching. Similar strategies were later used for amorphous carbon, [43] where hundreds of small structural snapshots could be generated in parallel runs using a computationally cheap interim potential, and the end points of these trajectories were evaluated with DFT and added to the database.…”
Section: Ingredient 1: Reference Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar strategies were later used for amorphous carbon, [43] where hundreds of small structural snapshots could be generated in parallel runs using a computationally cheap interim potential, and the end points of these trajectories were evaluated with DFT and added to the database. [5,49] A recently proposed strategy is to explore the PES using global searches [44][45][46][47] that are normally done in DFT-based crystalstructure prediction.…”
Section: Ingredient 1: Reference Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations