2017
DOI: 10.1007/s12190-017-1146-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure-preserving model reduction of second-order systems by Krylov subspace methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that preservation of the second-order structure in the ROM allows a meaningful physical interpretation and usually provides more accurate approximations, and an ROM which preserves the structural properties such as stability and passivity is highly desirable. Therefore, on the contrary, structure-preserving MOR techniques for second-order form systems are proposed, which have received a lot of attention during the last few years, including moment matching methods based on Krylov subspaces (Bai and Su, 2005;Jbilou and Kaouane, 2019;Xu et al, 2018), families of BT methods (Chahlaoui et al, 2006;Haider et al, 2019;Reis and Stykel, 2008;Uddin, 2020) and orthogonal polynomial methods (Qiu et al, 2018;Xiao et al, 2019b;Xiao and Jiang, 2014). Overview articles of different reduction methods are given in Antoulas (2005), Benner et al (2017), Jiang (2010) and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that preservation of the second-order structure in the ROM allows a meaningful physical interpretation and usually provides more accurate approximations, and an ROM which preserves the structural properties such as stability and passivity is highly desirable. Therefore, on the contrary, structure-preserving MOR techniques for second-order form systems are proposed, which have received a lot of attention during the last few years, including moment matching methods based on Krylov subspaces (Bai and Su, 2005;Jbilou and Kaouane, 2019;Xu et al, 2018), families of BT methods (Chahlaoui et al, 2006;Haider et al, 2019;Reis and Stykel, 2008;Uddin, 2020) and orthogonal polynomial methods (Qiu et al, 2018;Xiao et al, 2019b;Xiao and Jiang, 2014). Overview articles of different reduction methods are given in Antoulas (2005), Benner et al (2017), Jiang (2010) and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For engineering control and design of such a system, it is highly desirable to obtain a ROM which preserves the physically interpretable structure and the essential properties of the original model, such as stability and passivity. On the contrary, the others are structure preserving MOR techniques for second‐order form systems, which have received a lot of attention during the last few years including the families of balanced truncation (BT) [9, 10] methods, moment matching methods based on Krylov subspace [11, 12] and orthogonal polynomials methods [13, 14]. Overview articles of different reduction methods are given in [3, 15] and the references therein.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%